mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Automatic Metric Validation for Grammatical Error Correction

arXiv 1804.11225 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2018cs.CLcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Metric validation in Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) is currently done by observing the correlation between human and metric-induced rankings. However, such correlation studies are costly, methodologically troublesome, and suffer from low inter-rater agreement. We propose MAEGE, an automatic methodology for GEC metric validation, that overcomes many of the difficulties with existing practices. Experiments with maege shed a new light on metric quality, showing for example that the standard M2 metric fares poorly on corpus-level ranking. Moreover, we use MAEGE to perform a detailed analysis of metric behavior, showing that correcting some types of errors is consistently penalized by existing metrics.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 5; 2023: 3; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

17 papers.

Sort: