mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MuLER: Detailed and Scalable Reference-based Evaluation

arXiv 2305.14991 ↗First posted 24 May 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a novel methodology (namely, MuLER) that transforms any reference-based evaluation metric for text generation, such as machine translation (MT) into a fine-grained analysis tool. Given a system and a metric, MuLER quantifies how much the chosen metric penalizes specific error types (e.g., errors in translating names of locations). MuLER thus enables a detailed error analysis which can lead to targeted improvement efforts for specific phenomena. We perform experiments in both synthetic and naturalistic settings to support MuLER's validity and showcase its usability in MT evaluation, and other tasks, such as summarization. Analyzing all submissions to WMT in 2014-2020, we find consistent trends. For example, nouns and verbs are among the most frequent POS tags. However, they are among the hardest to translate. Performance on most POS tags improves with overall system performance, but a few are not thus correlated (their identity changes from language to language). Preliminary experiments with summarization reveal similar trends.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2023.

Builds on

21 of 60 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  4. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
  5. 2020Beyond Accuracy: Behavioral Testing of NLP models with CheckListcited by 1,006
  6. 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 812
  7. 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 584
  8. 2019BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for Englishcited by 564
  9. 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 442
  10. 2021Understanding Factuality in Abstractive Summarization with FRANK: A Benchmark for Factuality Metricscited by 287
  11. 2021The GEM Benchmark: Natural Language Generation, its Evaluation and Metricscited by 239
  12. 2021Q2: Evaluating Factual Consistency in Knowledge-Grounded Dialogues via Question Generation and Question Answeringcited by 132
9 more
  1. 2020GO FIGURE: A Meta Evaluation of Factuality in Summarizationcited by 76
  2. 2020Analyzing the Source and Target Contributions to Predictions in Neural Machine Translationcited by 71
  3. 2020Pre-trained Summarization Distillationcited by 71
  4. 2018Automatic Metric Validation for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 17
  5. 2021Mediators in Determining what Processing BERT Performs Firstcited by 14
  6. 2018Reference-less Measure of Faithfulness for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 9
  7. 2019Fine-grained evaluation of German-English Machine Translation based on a Test Suitecited by 6
  8. 2021GrASP: A Library for Extracting and Exploring Human-Interpretable Textual Patternscited by 6
  9. 2021On Neurons Invariant to Sentence Structural Changes in Neural Machine Translationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.