mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Some Grammatical Errors are Frequent, Others are Important

arXiv 2205.05730 ↗First posted 11 May 2022cs.CL cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In Grammatical Error Correction, systems are evaluated by the number of errors they correct. However, no one has assessed whether all error types are equally important. We provide and apply a method to quantify the importance of different grammatical error types to humans. We show that some rare errors are considered disturbing while other common ones are not. This affects possible directions to improve both systems and their evaluation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2022.

Builds on

6 of 22 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017JFLEG: A Fluency Corpus and Benchmark for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 97
  2. 2018Automatic Metric Validation for Grammatical Error Correctioncited by 17
  3. 2020A Comprehensive Survey of Grammar Error Correctioncited by 17
  4. 2018Inherent Biases in Reference based Evaluation for Grammatical Error Correction and Text Simplificationcited by 15
  5. 2020Classifying Syntactic Errors in Learner Languagecited by 11
  6. 2021SERRANT: a syntactic classifier for English Grammatical Error Typescited by 6

Built on by

Not cited yet.