mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Semantic Adversarial Deep Learning

arXiv 1804.07045 ↗First posted 19 Apr 2018cs.LG stat.MLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fueled by massive amounts of data, models produced by machine-learning (ML) algorithms, especially deep neural networks, are being used in diverse domains where trustworthiness is a concern, including automotive systems, finance, health care, natural language processing, and malware detection. Of particular concern is the use of ML algorithms in cyber-physical systems (CPS), such as self-driving cars and aviation, where an adversary can cause serious consequences. However, existing approaches to generating adversarial examples and devising robust ML algorithms mostly ignore the semantics and context of the overall system containing the ML component. For example, in an autonomous vehicle using deep learning for perception, not every adversarial example for the neural network might lead to a harmful consequence. Moreover, one may want to prioritize the search for adversarial examples towards those that significantly modify the desired semantics of the overall system. Along the same lines, existing algorithms for constructing robust ML algorithms ignore the specification of the overall system. In this paper, we argue that the semantics and specification of the overall system has a crucial role to play in this line of research. We present preliminary research results that support this claim.

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2018.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area: