mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Incorporating System-level Safety Requirements in Perception Models via Reinforcement Learning

arXiv 2412.02951 ↗First posted 4 Dec 2024cs.RO cs.LGcited by 0

On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → Safe and constrained RL

Abstract (arXiv)

Perception components in autonomous systems are often developed and optimized independently of downstream decision-making and control components, relying on established performance metrics like accuracy, precision, and recall. Traditional loss functions, such as cross-entropy loss and negative log-likelihood, focus on reducing misclassification errors but fail to consider their impact on system-level safety, overlooking the varying severities of system-level failures caused by these errors. To address this limitation, we propose a novel training paradigm that augments the perception component with an understanding of system-level safety objectives. Central to our approach is the translation of system-level safety requirements, formally specified using the rulebook formalism, into safety scores. These scores are then incorporated into the reward function of a reinforcement learning framework for fine-tuning perception models with system-level safety objectives. Simulation results demonstrate that models trained with this approach outperform baseline perception models in terms of system-level safety.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Safe and constrained RL, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 28 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Dec 2024.

Builds on

28 of 49 references.

References · 28

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  4. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  5. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,414
  6. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  7. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,659
  8. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,449
  9. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  10. 2023End-to-end Autonomous Driving: Challenges and Frontierscited by 490
  11. 2021Pix2seq: A Language Modeling Framework for Object Detectioncited by 349
  12. 2022OneFormer: One Transformer to Rule Universal Image Segmentationcited by 328
16 more
  1. 2016Control Barrier Function Based Quadratic Programs for Safety Critical Systemscited by 287
  2. 2024ReFT: Reasoning with Reinforced Fine-Tuningcited by 239
  3. 2017Hamilton-Jacobi Reachability: A Brief Overview and Recent Advancescited by 201
  4. 2018Verisig: verifying safety properties of hybrid systems with neural network controllerscited by 84
  5. 2019Liability, Ethics, and Culture-Aware Behavior Specification using Rulebookscited by 43
  6. 2022DiffStack: A Differentiable and Modular Control Stack for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 37
  7. 2023Tuning computer vision models with task rewardscited by 37
  8. 2024Formal Verification and Control with Conformal Predictioncited by 26
  9. 2020Formal Analysis and Redesign of a Neural Network-Based Aircraft Taxiing System with VerifAIcited by 21
  10. 2018Semantic Adversarial Deep Learningcited by 15
  11. 2013Incremental Sampling-based Algorithm for Minimum-violation Motion Planningcited by 9
  12. 2020Minimum-Violation Planning for Autonomous Systems: Theoretical and Practical Considerationscited by 7
  13. 2022Responsibility-Sensitive Safety: an Introduction with an Eye to Logical Foundations and Formalizationcited by 6
  14. 2022nuReality: A VR environment for research of pedestrian and autonomous vehicle interactionscited by 3
  15. 2024GENESIS-RL: GEnerating Natural Edge-cases with Systematic Integration of Safety considerations and Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
  16. 2021Leveraging Classification Metrics for Quantitative System-Level Analysis with Temporal Logic Specificationscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025SafeVLA: Towards Safety Alignment of Vision-Language-Action Model via Constrained Learning
  2. 2025Safety Representations for Safer Policy Learning
  3. 2025Provably Optimal Reinforcement Learning under Safety Filtering
  4. 2026ForesightSafety-VLA: A Unified Diagnostic Safety Benchmark for Vision-Language-Action Models
  5. 2026Evaluation Metrics for Safe Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2025Driving Through Uncertainty: Risk-Averse Control with LLM Commonsense for Autonomous Driving under Perception Deficits
  7. 2025AGENTSAFE: Benchmarking the Safety of Embodied Agents on Hazardous Instructions
  8. 2025Breaking the Safety-Capability Tradeoff: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Maintains Safety Guardrails in LLMs