ResNEsts and DenseNEsts: Block-based DNN Models with Improved Representation Guarantees
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Models recently used in the literature proving residual networks (ResNets) are better than linear predictors are actually different from standard ResNets that have been widely used in computer vision. In addition to the assumptions such as scalar-valued output or single residual block, these models have no nonlinearities at the final residual representation that feeds into the final affine layer. To codify such a difference in nonlinearities and reveal a linear estimation property, we define ResNEsts, i.e., Residual Nonlinear Estimators, by simply dropping nonlinearities at the last residual representation from standard ResNets. We show that wide ResNEsts with bottleneck blocks can always guarantee a very desirable training property that standard ResNets aim to achieve, i.e., adding more blocks does not decrease performance given the same set of basis elements. To prove that, we first recognize ResNEsts are basis function models that are limited by a coupling problem in basis learning and linear prediction. Then, to decouple prediction weights from basis learning, we construct a special architecture termed augmented ResNEst (A-ResNEst) that always guarantees no worse performance with the addition of a block. As a result, such an A-ResNEst establishes empirical risk lower bounds for a ResNEst using corresponding bases. Our results demonstrate ResNEsts indeed have a problem of diminishing feature reuse; however, it can be avoided by sufficiently expanding or widening the input space, leading to the above-mentioned desirable property. Inspired by the DenseNets that have been shown to outperform ResNets, we also propose a corresponding new model called Densely connected Nonlinear Estimator (DenseNEst). We show that any DenseNEst can be represented as a wide ResNEst with bottleneck blocks. Unlike ResNEsts, DenseNEsts exhibit the desirable property without any special architectural re-design.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Nov 2021.
Builds on
27 of 34 references.
References · 27
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,789
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
- 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,292
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
- 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
- 2017Visualizing the Loss Landscape of Neural Netscited by 1,130
15 more
- 2015Accurate Image Super-Resolution Using Very Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 903
- 2014Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimizationcited by 289
- 2015Highway Networkscited by 260
- 2015Escaping From Saddle Points --- Online Stochastic Gradient for Tensor Decompositioncited by 243
- 2016Deep Learning without Poor Local Minimacited by 234
- 2017Convergence Analysis of Two-layer Neural Networks with ReLU Activationcited by 137
- 2016Identity Matters in Deep Learningcited by 109
- 2014Convolutional Neural Networks at Constrained Time Costcited by 81
- 2017The Microsoft 2017 Conversational Speech Recognition Systemcited by 52
- 2018Understanding the Loss Surface of Neural Networks for Binary Classificationcited by 27
- 2017Residual LSTM: Design of a Deep Recurrent Architecture for Distant Speech Recognitioncited by 19
- 2019Towards Understanding the Importance of Shortcut Connections in Residual Networkscited by 18
- 2018Depth with Nonlinearity Creates No Bad Local Minima in ResNetscited by 17
- 2018Are ResNets Provably Better than Linear Predictors?cited by 12
- 2019Are deep ResNets provably better than linear predictors?cited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2022Improved Bounds on Neural Complexity for Representing Piecewise Linear Functionscited by 26
- 2023A DNN based Normalized Time-frequency Weighted Criterion for Robust Wideband DoA Estimationcited by 3
- 2024Subspace Representation Learning for Sparse Linear Arrays to Localize More Sources than Sensors: A Deep Learning Methodologycited by 2
- 2025A Comparative Study of Invariance-Aware Loss Functions for Deep Learning-based Gridless Direction-of-Arrival Estimationcited by 0
- 2026Sparse Bayesian Learning Algorithms Revisited: From Learning Majorizers to Structured Algorithmic Learning using Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Topological Kalman Filtering on Cell Complexescited by 0
- 2026Topological Kalman Filtering on Cell Complexes15 May 2026
- 2026Sparse Bayesian Learning Algorithms Revisited: From Learning Majorizers to Structured Algorithmic Learning using Neural Networks2 Apr 2026
- 2025A Comparative Study of Invariance-Aware Loss Functions for Deep Learning-based Gridless Direction-of-Arrival Estimation16 Mar 2025
- 2024Subspace Representation Learning for Sparse Linear Arrays to Localize More Sources than Sensors: A Deep Learning Methodology29 Aug 2024
- 2023A DNN based Normalized Time-frequency Weighted Criterion for Robust Wideband DoA Estimation20 Feb 2023
- 2022Improved Bounds on Neural Complexity for Representing Piecewise Linear Functions13 Oct 2022