mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Mix-and-Match Tuning for Self-Supervised Semantic Segmentation

arXiv 1712.00661 ↗First posted 2 Dec 2017cs.CV cs.LGcited by 17

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep convolutional networks for semantic image segmentation typically require large-scale labeled data, e.g. ImageNet and MS COCO, for network pre-training. To reduce annotation efforts, self-supervised semantic segmentation is recently proposed to pre-train a network without any human-provided labels. The key of this new form of learning is to design a proxy task (e.g. image colorization), from which a discriminative loss can be formulated on unlabeled data. Many proxy tasks, however, lack the critical supervision signals that could induce discriminative representation for the target image segmentation task. Thus self-supervision's performance is still far from that of supervised pre-training. In this study, we overcome this limitation by incorporating a "mix-and-match" (M&M) tuning stage in the self-supervision pipeline. The proposed approach is readily pluggable to many self-supervision methods and does not use more annotated samples than the original process. Yet, it is capable of boosting the performance of target image segmentation task to surpass fully-supervised pre-trained counterpart. The improvement is made possible by better harnessing the limited pixel-wise annotations in the target dataset. Specifically, we first introduce the "mix" stage, which sparsely samples and mixes patches from the target set to reflect rich and diverse local patch statistics of target images. A "match" stage then forms a class-wise connected graph, which can be used to derive a strong triplet-based discriminative loss for fine-tuning the network. Our paradigm follows the standard practice in existing self-supervised studies and no extra data or label is required. With the proposed M&M approach, for the first time, a self-supervision method can achieve comparable or even better performance compared to its ImageNet pre-trained counterpart on both PASCAL VOC2012 dataset and CityScapes dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Dec 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 8; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

17 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024ShieldGemma: Generative AI Content Moderation Based on Gemmacited by 243
  2. 2021Unsupervised Semantic Segmentation by Contrasting Object Mask Proposalscited by 190
  3. 2021Large-scale Unsupervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 101
  4. 2021Pixel Contrastive-Consistent Semi-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 101
  5. 2022Unsupervised Salient Object Detection with Spectral Cluster Votingcited by 56
  6. 2021Unleashing the Power of Contrastive Self-Supervised Visual Models via Contrast-Regularized Fine-Tuningcited by 50
  7. 2021Exploring Robustness of Unsupervised Domain Adaptation in Semantic Segmentationcited by 20
  8. 2023Probabilistic Prompt Learning for Dense Predictioncited by 17
  9. 2022Improving Fine-tuning of Self-supervised Models with Contrastive Initializationcited by 10
  10. 2023DR-Tune: Improving Fine-tuning of Pretrained Visual Models by Distribution Regularization with Semantic Calibrationcited by 6
  11. 2021Exploring Pixel-level Self-supervision for Weakly Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 5
  12. 2021Coherent, super resolved radar beamforming using self-supervised learningcited by 4
5 more
  1. 2022Physics and semantic informed multi-sensor calibration via optimization theory and self-supervised learningcited by 4
  2. 2021Bootstrapped Self-Supervised Training with Monocular Video for Semantic Segmentation and Depth Estimationcited by 2
  3. 2023Training Semantic Segmentation on Heterogeneous Datasetscited by 2
  4. 2022Adversarial Lagrangian Integrated Contrastive Embedding for Limited Size Datasetscited by 0
  5. 2026CoVFT: Context-aware Visual Fine-tuning for Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 0