mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adversarial Lagrangian Integrated Contrastive Embedding for Limited Size Datasets

arXiv 2210.03261 ↗First posted 6 Oct 2022cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Certain datasets contain a limited number of samples with highly various styles and complex structures. This study presents a novel adversarial Lagrangian integrated contrastive embedding (ALICE) method for small-sized datasets. First, the accuracy improvement and training convergence of the proposed pre-trained adversarial transfer are shown on various subsets of datasets with few samples. Second, a novel adversarial integrated contrastive model using various augmentation techniques is investigated. The proposed structure considers the input samples with different appearances and generates a superior representation with adversarial transfer contrastive training. Finally, multi-objective augmented Lagrangian multipliers encourage the low-rank and sparsity of the presented adversarial contrastive embedding to adaptively estimate the coefficients of the regularizers automatically to the optimum weights. The sparsity constraint suppresses less representative elements in the feature space. The low-rank constraint eliminates trivial and redundant components and enables superior generalization. The performance of the proposed model is verified by conducting ablation studies by using benchmark datasets for scenarios with small data samples.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Oct 2022.

Builds on

27 of 41 references.

References · 27

  1. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
  2. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  3. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  4. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 843
  5. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  6. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
  7. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
  8. 2019Adversarial Examples Improve Image Recognitioncited by 283
  9. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 275
  10. 2018Explicit Inductive Bias for Transfer Learning with Convolutional Networkscited by 226
  11. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  12. 2020What makes instance discrimination good for transfer learning?cited by 111
15 more
  1. 2021Exploring the Limits of Large Scale Pre-trainingcited by 104
  2. 2021Contrastive Learning with Stronger Augmentationscited by 100
  3. 2015Compact Bilinear Poolingcited by 97
  4. 2022Head2Toe: Utilizing Intermediate Representations for Better Transfer Learningcited by 83
  5. 2019DELTA: DEep Learning Transfer using Feature Map with Attention for Convolutional Networkscited by 80
  6. 2021When Does Contrastive Learning Preserve Adversarial Robustness from Pretraining to Finetuning?cited by 76
  7. 2017Towards Faster Training of Global Covariance Pooling Networks by Iterative Matrix Square Root Normalizationcited by 65
  8. 2022Transferability in Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 57
  9. 2021Self-Tuning for Data-Efficient Deep Learningcited by 39
  10. 2020Augmented Lagrangian Adversarial Attackscited by 28
  11. 2020RIFLE: Backpropagation in Depth for Deep Transfer Learning through Re-Initializing the Fully-connected LayErcited by 27
  12. 2017Mix-and-Match Tuning for Self-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 17
  13. 2020Multi-Objective Matrix Normalization for Fine-grained Visual Recognitioncited by 15
  14. 2020Bi-tuning of Pre-trained Representationscited by 15
  15. 2016Gradient-Based Multiobjective Optimization with Uncertaintiescited by 11

Built on by

Not cited yet.