mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

DR-Tune: Improving Fine-tuning of Pretrained Visual Models by Distribution Regularization with Semantic Calibration

arXiv 2308.12058 ↗First posted 23 Aug 2023cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The visual models pretrained on large-scale benchmarks encode general knowledge and prove effective in building more powerful representations for downstream tasks. Most existing approaches follow the fine-tuning paradigm, either by initializing or regularizing the downstream model based on the pretrained one. The former fails to retain the knowledge in the successive fine-tuning phase, thereby prone to be over-fitting, and the latter imposes strong constraints to the weights or feature maps of the downstream model without considering semantic drift, often incurring insufficient optimization. To deal with these issues, we propose a novel fine-tuning framework, namely distribution regularization with semantic calibration (DR-Tune). It employs distribution regularization by enforcing the downstream task head to decrease its classification error on the pretrained feature distribution, which prevents it from over-fitting while enabling sufficient training of downstream encoders. Furthermore, to alleviate the interference by semantic drift, we develop the semantic calibration (SC) module to align the global shape and class centers of the pretrained and downstream feature distributions. Extensive experiments on widely used image classification datasets show that DR-Tune consistently improves the performance when combing with various backbones under different pretraining strategies. Code is available at: https://github.com/weeknan/DR-Tune.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 48 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2023.

Builds on

48 of 71 references.

References · 48

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
  4. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  5. 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
  6. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  7. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  8. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  9. 2020Unsupervised Learning of Visual Features by Contrasting Cluster Assignmentscited by 2,857
  10. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
  11. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,546
  12. 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,375
36 more
  1. 2020Improved Baselines with Momentum Contrastive Learningcited by 2,287
  2. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
  3. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  4. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
  5. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  6. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  7. 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,653
  8. 2021BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-modelscited by 1,245
  9. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  10. 2016Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfercited by 1,077
  11. 2019Relational Knowledge Distillationcited by 889
  12. 2020What Makes for Good Views for Contrastive Learning?cited by 846
  13. 2020Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representationscited by 640
  14. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
  15. 2017Learning multiple visual domains with residual adapterscited by 557
  16. 2019A Large-scale Study of Representation Learning with the Visual Task Adaptation Benchmarkcited by 425
  17. 2018Rethinking ImageNet Pre-trainingcited by 377
  18. 2019Transfusion: Understanding Transfer Learning for Medical Imagingcited by 368
  19. 2021Prompting Visual-Language Models for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 310
  20. 2022Scaling & Shifting Your Features: A New Baseline for Efficient Model Tuningcited by 294
  21. 2020Supervised Contrastive Learning for Pre-trained Language Model Fine-tuningcited by 276
  22. 2022Exploring Visual Prompts for Adapting Large-Scale Modelscited by 274
  23. 2018Explicit Inductive Bias for Transfer Learning with Convolutional Networkscited by 227
  24. 2020How Well Do Self-Supervised Models Transfer?cited by 213
  25. 2020Recall and Learn: Fine-tuning Deep Pretrained Language Models with Less Forgettingcited by 170
  26. 2018Efficient parametrization of multi-domain deep neural networkscited by 168
  27. 2019Cross-Batch Memory for Embedding Learningcited by 132
  28. 2019DELTA: DEep Learning Transfer using Feature Map with Attention for Convolutional Networkscited by 80
  29. 2022Conv-Adapter: Exploring Parameter Efficient Transfer Learning for ConvNetscited by 62
  30. 2022Pro-tuning: Unified Prompt Tuning for Vision Taskscited by 53
  31. 2021Unleashing the Power of Contrastive Self-Supervised Visual Models via Contrast-Regularized Fine-Tuningcited by 50
  32. 2020Distance-Based Regularisation of Deep Networks for Fine-Tuningcited by 48
  33. 2022HCSC: Hierarchical Contrastive Selective Codingcited by 43
  34. 2020RIFLE: Backpropagation in Depth for Deep Transfer Learning through Re-Initializing the Fully-connected LayErcited by 27
  35. 2017Mix-and-Match Tuning for Self-Supervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 17
  36. 2020Bi-tuning of Pre-trained Representationscited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

6 papers.