On Optimal Generalizability in Parametric Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the parametric learning problem, where the objective of the learner is determined by a parametric loss function. Employing empirical risk minimization with possibly regularization, the inferred parameter vector will be biased toward the training samples. Such bias is measured by the cross validation procedure in practice where the data set is partitioned into a training set used for training and a validation set, which is not used in training and is left to measure the out-of-sample performance. A classical cross validation strategy is the leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV) where one sample is left out for validation and training is done on the rest of the samples that are presented to the learner, and this process is repeated on all of the samples. LOOCV is rarely used in practice due to the high computational complexity. In this paper, we first develop a computationally efficient approximate LOOCV (ALOOCV) and provide theoretical guarantees for its performance. Then we use ALOOCV to provide an optimization algorithm for finding the regularizer in the empirical risk minimization framework. In our numerical experiments, we illustrate the accuracy and efficiency of ALOOCV as well as our proposed framework for the optimization of the regularizer.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Nov 2017.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 2; 2024: 4; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
12 papers.
- 2022Algorithms that Approximate Data Removal: New Results and Limitationscited by 40
- 2023Iterative Approximate Cross-Validationcited by 7
- 2025Certified Data Removal Under High-dimensional Settingscited by 6
- 2024Theoretical Analysis of Leave-one-out Cross Validation for Non-differentiable Penalties under High-dimensional Settingscited by 5
- 2023Optimizer's Information Criterion: Dissecting and Correcting Bias in Data-Driven Optimizationcited by 4
- 2024Meta SAC-Lag: Towards Deployable Safe Reinforcement Learning via MetaGradient-based Hyperparameter Tuningcited by 3
- 2024The Approximate Fisher Influence Function: Faster Estimation of Data Influence in Statistical Modelscited by 2
- 2026Imperfect Influence, Preserved Rankings: A Theory of TRAK for Data Attributioncited by 2
- 2022Tradeoffs between convergence rate and noise amplification for momentum-based accelerated optimization algorithmscited by 1
- 2024FIVB ranking: Misstep in the right directioncited by 1
- 2022Robust leave-one-out cross-validation for high-dimensional Bayesian modelscited by 0
- 2026Accelerating Conformal Prediction via Approximate Leave-One-Outcited by 0
- 2026Accelerating Conformal Prediction via Approximate Leave-One-Out30 Jun 2026
- 2026Imperfect Influence, Preserved Rankings: A Theory of TRAK for Data Attribution1 Feb 2026
- 2025Certified Data Removal Under High-dimensional Settings12 May 2025
- 2024Meta SAC-Lag: Towards Deployable Safe Reinforcement Learning via MetaGradient-based Hyperparameter Tuning15 Aug 2024
- 2024FIVB ranking: Misstep in the right direction2 Aug 2024
- 2024The Approximate Fisher Influence Function: Faster Estimation of Data Influence in Statistical Models11 Jul 2024
- 2024Theoretical Analysis of Leave-one-out Cross Validation for Non-differentiable Penalties under High-dimensional Settings13 Feb 2024
- 2023Optimizer's Information Criterion: Dissecting and Correcting Bias in Data-Driven Optimization16 Jun 2023
- 2023Iterative Approximate Cross-Validation5 Mar 2023
- 2022Algorithms that Approximate Data Removal: New Results and Limitations25 Sep 2022
- 2022Tradeoffs between convergence rate and noise amplification for momentum-based accelerated optimization algorithms24 Sep 2022
- 2022Robust leave-one-out cross-validation for high-dimensional Bayesian models19 Sep 2022