Iterative Approximate Cross-Validation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cross-validation (CV) is one of the most popular tools for assessing and selecting predictive models. However, standard CV suffers from high computational cost when the number of folds is large. Recently, under the empirical risk minimization (ERM) framework, a line of works proposed efficient methods to approximate CV based on the solution of the ERM problem trained on the full dataset. However, in large-scale problems, it can be hard to obtain the exact solution of the ERM problem, either due to limited computational resources or due to early stopping as a way of preventing overfitting. In this paper, we propose a new paradigm to efficiently approximate CV when the ERM problem is solved via an iterative first-order algorithm, without running until convergence. Our new method extends existing guarantees for CV approximation to hold along the whole trajectory of the algorithm, including at convergence, thus generalizing existing CV approximation methods. Finally, we illustrate the accuracy and computational efficiency of our method through a range of empirical studies.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2023.
Builds on
13 of 28 references.
References · 13
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
- 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,061
- 2019Certified Data Removal from Machine Learning Modelscited by 535
- 2019Making AI Forget You: Data Deletion in Machine Learningcited by 465
- 2020Descent-to-Delete: Gradient-Based Methods for Machine Unlearningcited by 311
- 2020Approximate Data Deletion from Machine Learning Modelscited by 255
- 2018Nonconvex Optimization Meets Low-Rank Matrix Factorization: An Overviewcited by 160
- 2013Regularized M-estimators with nonconvexity: Statistical and algorithmic theory for local optimacited by 66
- 2018A Swiss Army Infinitesimal Jackknifecited by 54
- 2018Approximate Leave-One-Out for Fast Parameter Tuning in High Dimensionscited by 15
- 2020Approximate Cross-validation: Guarantees for Model Assessment and Selectioncited by 14
- 2017On Optimal Generalizability in Parametric Learningcited by 12
1 more
- 2020Approximate Cross-Validation for Structured Modelscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 1.
7 papers.
- 2024Theoretical Analysis of Leave-one-out Cross Validation for Non-differentiable Penalties under High-dimensional Settingscited by 5
- 2024Failures and Successes of Cross-Validation for Early-Stopped Gradient Descentcited by 4
- 2023Approximate Leave-one-out Cross Validation for Regression with ℓ1 Regularizers (extended version)cited by 3
- 2024Distributional bias compromises leave-one-out cross-validationcited by 1
- 2024RandALO: Out-of-sample risk estimation in no time flatcited by 1
- 2024Estimating Generalization Performance Along the Trajectory of Proximal SGD in Robust Regressioncited by 0
- 2025A Ridge Too Far: Correcting Over-Shrinkage via Negative Regularizationcited by 0
- 2025A Ridge Too Far: Correcting Over-Shrinkage via Negative Regularization24 Aug 2025
- 2024Estimating Generalization Performance Along the Trajectory of Proximal SGD in Robust Regression3 Oct 2024
- 2024RandALO: Out-of-sample risk estimation in no time flat15 Sep 2024
- 2024Distributional bias compromises leave-one-out cross-validation3 Jun 2024
- 2024Failures and Successes of Cross-Validation for Early-Stopped Gradient Descent26 Feb 2024
- 2024Theoretical Analysis of Leave-one-out Cross Validation for Non-differentiable Penalties under High-dimensional Settings13 Feb 2024
- 2023Approximate Leave-one-out Cross Validation for Regression with ℓ1 Regularizers (extended version)26 Oct 2023