Policy Gradient with Active Importance Sampling
On the map: Deep reinforcement learning methods → RL theory and sample complexity
Abstract (arXiv)
Importance sampling (IS) represents a fundamental technique for a large surge of off-policy reinforcement learning approaches. Policy gradient (PG) methods, in particular, significantly benefit from IS, enabling the effective reuse of previously collected samples, thus increasing sample efficiency. However, classically, IS is employed in RL as a passive tool for re-weighting historical samples. However, the statistical community employs IS as an active tool combined with the use of behavioral distributions that allow the reduction of the estimate variance even below the sample mean one. In this paper, we focus on this second setting by addressing the behavioral policy optimization (BPO) problem. We look for the best behavioral policy from which to collect samples to reduce the policy gradient variance as much as possible. We provide an iterative algorithm that alternates between the cross-entropy estimation of the minimum-variance behavioral policy and the actual policy optimization, leveraging on defensive IS. We theoretically analyze such an algorithm, showing that it enjoys a convergence rate of order O(ε-4) to a stationary point, but depending on a more convenient variance term w.r.t. standard PG methods. We then provide a practical version that is numerically validated, showing the advantages in the policy gradient estimation variance and on the learning speed.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in RL theory and sample complexity, one of 15 directions in Deep reinforcement learning methods. Builds on 16 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2024.
Builds on
16 of 31 references.
References · 16
- 2019Momentum-Based Variance Reduction in Non-Convex SGDcited by 306
- 2017SARAH: A Novel Method for Machine Learning Problems Using Stochastic Recursive Gradientcited by 220
- 2020PAGE: A Simple and Optimal Probabilistic Gradient Estimator for Nonconvex Optimizationcited by 119
- 2018Stochastic Variance-Reduced Policy Gradientcited by 106
- 2013The Optimal Reward Baseline for Gradient-Based Reinforcement Learningcited by 85
- 2021A general sample complexity analysis of vanilla policy gradientcited by 76
- 2019Sample Efficient Policy Gradient Methods with Recursive Variance Reductioncited by 60
- 2019An Improved Convergence Analysis of Stochastic Variance-Reduced Policy Gradientcited by 59
- 2021Efficient First-Order Contextual Bandits: Prediction, Allocation, and Triangular Discriminationcited by 53
- 2018Policy Optimization via Importance Samplingcited by 47
- 2017Data-Efficient Policy Evaluation Through Behavior Policy Searchcited by 26
- 2023The Role of Baselines in Policy Gradient Optimizationcited by 25
4 more
- 2020Stochastic Recursive Momentum for Policy Gradient Methodscited by 24
- 2019Smoothing Policies and Safe Policy Gradientscited by 21
- 2019First-Order Bayesian Regret Analysis of Thompson Samplingcited by 17
- 2022PAGE-PG: A Simple and Loopless Variance-Reduced Policy Gradient Method with Probabilistic Gradient Estimationcited by 17
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 5.
10 papers.
- 2025A-3PO: Accelerating Asynchronous LLM Training with Staleness-aware Proximal Policy Approximationcited by 12
- 2025Relative Entropy Pathwise Policy Optimizationcited by 7
- 2025Adaptive Exploration for Multi-Reward Multi-Policy Evaluationcited by 6
- 2025Reusing Trajectories in Policy Gradients Enables Fast Convergencecited by 1
- 2025Clustered KL-barycenter design for policy evaluationcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Token-Level Policy Gradients for Complex Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Actor-Critic with Active Importance Samplingcited by 0
- 2026Reusing Past Samples in Proximal Policy Optimization: When and How Does It Help?cited by 0
- 2026Understanding Enrichment in Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
- 2026When Does External Guidance Help LLM Reasoning? A Bias-Variance Theory of Guidance-Augmented GRPOcited by 0
- 2026Understanding Enrichment in Reinforcement Learning2 Oct 2026
- 2026Reusing Past Samples in Proximal Policy Optimization: When and How Does It Help?1 Oct 2026
- 2026When Does External Guidance Help LLM Reasoning? A Bias-Variance Theory of Guidance-Augmented GRPO8 Jul 2026
- 2026Actor-Critic with Active Importance Sampling8 May 2026
- 2026Beyond Token-Level Policy Gradients for Complex Reasoning with Large Language Models16 Feb 2026
- 2025A-3PO: Accelerating Asynchronous LLM Training with Staleness-aware Proximal Policy Approximation6 Dec 2025
- 2025Relative Entropy Pathwise Policy Optimization15 Jul 2025
- 2025Reusing Trajectories in Policy Gradients Enables Fast Convergence6 Jun 2025
- 2025Clustered KL-barycenter design for policy evaluation4 Mar 2025
- 2025Adaptive Exploration for Multi-Reward Multi-Policy Evaluation4 Feb 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Reusing Historical Trajectories in Natural Policy Gradient via Importance Sampling: Convergence and Convergence Rate
- 2026Sample complexity of variance-reduced policy gradient: weaker assumptions and lower bounds
- 2026Rethinking Importance Sampling in LLM Policy Optimization: A Cumulative Token Perspective
- 2026Beyond Importance Sampling: Rejection-Gated Policy Optimization
- 2025Demystifying the Paradox of Importance Sampling with an Estimated History-Dependent Behavior Policy in Off-Policy Evaluation
- 2025Behaviour Policy Optimization: Provably Lower Variance Return Estimates for Off-Policy Reinforcement Learning
- 2026Variance-Reduced Policy Gradient is Nearly Minimax-Optimal
- 2026Variance Reduction Based Experience Replay for Policy Optimization