mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Learning Quadratic Variance Function (QVF) DAG models via OverDispersion Scoring (ODS)

arXiv 1704.08783 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2017stat.ML cs.LGcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Learning DAG or Bayesian network models is an important problem in multi-variate causal inference. However, a number of challenges arises in learning large-scale DAG models including model identifiability and computational complexity since the space of directed graphs is huge. In this paper, we address these issues in a number of steps for a broad class of DAG models where the noise or variance is signal-dependent. Firstly we introduce a new class of identifiable DAG models, where each node has a distribution where the variance is a quadratic function of the mean (QVF DAG models). Our QVF DAG models include many interesting classes of distributions such as Poisson, Binomial, Geometric, Exponential, Gamma and many other distributions in which the noise variance depends on the mean. We prove that this class of QVF DAG models is identifiable, and introduce a new algorithm, the OverDispersion Scoring (ODS) algorithm, for learning large-scale QVF DAG models. Our algorithm is based on firstly learning the moralized or undirected graphical model representation of the DAG to reduce the DAG search-space, and then exploiting the quadratic variance property to learn the causal ordering. We show through theoretical results and simulations that our algorithm is statistically consistent in the high-dimensional p>n setting provided that the degree of the moralized graph is bounded and performs well compared to state-of-the-art DAG-learning algorithms.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 2; 2023: 8; 2024: 4; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022DAGMA: Learning DAGs via M-matrices and a Log-Determinant Acyclicity Characterizationcited by 135
  2. 2021Efficient Bayesian network structure learning via local Markov boundary searchcited by 14
  3. 2022Optimal estimation of Gaussian DAG modelscited by 14
  4. 2021Structure learning in polynomial time: Greedy algorithms, Bregman information, and exponential familiescited by 10
  5. 2024Markov Equivalence and Consistency in Differentiable Structure Learningcited by 6
  6. 2023Structural restrictions in local causal discovery: identifying direct causes of a target variablecited by 5
  7. 2023Learning bounded-degree polytrees with known skeletoncited by 5
  8. 2024Causal Discovery from Poisson Branching Structural Causal Model Using High-Order Cumulant with Path Analysiscited by 3
  9. 2023Distinguishing Cause from Effect on Categorical Data: The Uniform Channel Modelcited by 1
  10. 2023Information Theoretically Optimal Sample Complexity of Learning Dynamical Directed Acyclic Graphscited by 1
  11. 2023Causal Discovery with Generalized Linear Models through Peeling Algorithmscited by 1
  12. 2024Personalized Binomial DAGs Learning with Network Structured Covariatescited by 1
6 more
  1. 2023Graphical estimation of multivariate count time seriescited by 0
  2. 2023Distributionally Robust Skeleton Learning of Discrete Bayesian Networkscited by 0
  3. 2023Bayesian Approach to Linear Bayesian Networkscited by 0
  4. 2024Generalized Criterion for Identifiability of Additive Noise Models Using Majorizationcited by 0
  5. 2026Causal DAG Identification for Count Data via Poisson Thinning Structural Equation Modelscited by 0
  6. 2026Discrete Score Matching Enables Causal Discovery from Count Datacited by 0