mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Accurately and Efficiently Interpreting Human-Robot Instructions of Varying Granularities

arXiv 1704.06616 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2017cs.AIcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Humans can ground natural language commands to tasks at both abstract and fine-grained levels of specificity. For instance, a human forklift operator can be instructed to perform a high-level action, like "grab a pallet" or a low-level action like "tilt back a little bit." While robots are also capable of grounding language commands to tasks, previous methods implicitly assume that all commands and tasks reside at a single, fixed level of abstraction. Additionally, methods that do not use multiple levels of abstraction encounter inefficient planning and execution times as they solve tasks at a single level of abstraction with large, intractable state-action spaces closely resembling real world complexity. In this work, by grounding commands to all the tasks or subtasks available in a hierarchical planning framework, we arrive at a model capable of interpreting language at multiple levels of specificity ranging from coarse to more granular. We show that the accuracy of the grounding procedure is improved when simultaneously inferring the degree of abstraction in language used to communicate the task. Leveraging hierarchy also improves efficiency: our proposed approach enables a robot to respond to a command within one second on 90% of our tasks, while baselines take over twenty seconds on half the tasks. Finally, we demonstrate that a real, physical robot can ground commands at multiple levels of abstraction allowing it to efficiently plan different subtasks within the same planning hierarchy.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 4; 2023: 6; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Language-Driven Representation Learning for Roboticscited by 165
  2. 2021Learning Language-Conditioned Robot Behavior from Offline Data and Crowd-Sourced Annotationcited by 118
  3. 2022Correcting Robot Plans with Natural Language Feedbackcited by 69
  4. 2023"No, to the Right" -- Online Language Corrections for Robotic Manipulation via Shared Autonomycited by 60
  5. 2022Inferring Rewards from Language in Contextcited by 50
  6. 2021ELLA: Exploration through Learned Language Abstractioncited by 42
  7. 2023AlignDiff: Aligning Diverse Human Preferences via Behavior-Customisable Diffusion Modelcited by 37
  8. 2022LISA: Learning Interpretable Skill Abstractions from Languagecited by 30
  9. 2023Vision-Language Interpreter for Robot Task Planningcited by 30
  10. 2021LILA: Language-Informed Latent Actionscited by 27
  11. 2022Perceiving the World: Question-guided Reinforcement Learning for Text-based Gamescited by 10
  12. 2021Natural Language Specification of Reinforcement Learning Policies through Differentiable Decision Treescited by 4
7 more
  1. 2021Guided Policy Search for Parameterized Skills using Adverbscited by 2
  2. 2023A Reminder of its Brittleness: Language Reward Shaping May Hinder Learning for Instruction Following Agentscited by 2
  3. 2023Learning a Hierarchical Planner from Humans in Multiple Generationscited by 1
  4. 2026Mini-BEHAVIOR-Gran: Revealing U-Shaped Effects of Instruction Granularity on Language-Guided Embodied Agentscited by 1
  5. 2024Effective Reward Specification in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  6. 2025CLIP-RL: Aligning Language and Policy Representations for Task Transfer in Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  7. 2026Instance-Enriched Semantic Maps for Visual Language Navigationcited by 0