mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Inductive Pairwise Ranking: Going Beyond the n log(n) Barrier

arXiv 1702.02661 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2017cs.LG cs.IT math.ITcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of ranking a set of items from nonactively chosen pairwise preferences where each item has feature information with it. We propose and characterize a very broad class of preference matrices giving rise to the Feature Low Rank (FLR) model, which subsumes several models ranging from the classic Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) (Bradley and Terry 1952) and Thurstone (Thurstone 1927) models to the recently proposed blade-chest (Chen and Joachims 2016) and generic low-rank preference (Rajkumar and Agarwal 2016) models. We use the technique of matrix completion in the presence of side information to develop the Inductive Pairwise Ranking (IPR) algorithm that provably learns a good ranking under the FLR model, in a sample-efficient manner. In practice, through systematic synthetic simulations, we confirm our theoretical findings regarding improvements in the sample complexity due to the use of feature information. Moreover, on popular real-world preference learning datasets, with as less as 10% sampling of the pairwise comparisons, our method recovers a good ranking.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2018Ranking with Features: Algorithm and A Graph Theoretic Analysis ↗
  2. 2022Ranking Inferences Based on the Top Choice of Multiway Comparisons
  3. 2017Spectral Method and Regularized MLE Are Both Optimal for Top-K Ranking
  4. 2025SP-Rank: A Dataset for Ranked Preferences with Secondary Information
  5. 2025When Less Is More: Binary Feedback Can Outperform Ordinal Comparisons in Ranking Recovery
  6. 2026Prompt-Dependent Ranking of Large Language Models with Uncertainty Quantification
  7. 2026How Many Repeated Pairwise Comparisons Are Needed for Ranking under Heterogeneity?
  8. 2026Learning a Ranking from Human Feedback in Log-Concave Random Utility Models