mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Sample Complexity of Rank Regression from Pairwise Comparisons

arXiv 2105.01463 ↗First posted 4 May 2021stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We consider a rank regression setting, in which a dataset of N samples with features in ℝd is ranked by an oracle via M pairwise comparisons. Specifically, there exists a latent total ordering of the samples; when presented with a pair of samples, a noisy oracle identifies the one ranked higher with respect to the underlying total ordering. A learner observes a dataset of such comparisons and wishes to regress sample ranks from their features. We show that to learn the model parameters with ε > 0 accuracy, it suffices to conduct M ∈ Omega(dNlog3 N/ε2) comparisons uniformly at random when N is Omega(d/ε2).

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2021.

Builds on

7 of 70 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016Deep Learning the City : Quantifying Urban Perception At A Global Scalecited by 65
  2. 2015Stochastically Transitive Models for Pairwise Comparisons: Statistical and Computational Issuescited by 32
  3. 2017Active classification with comparison queriescited by 27
  4. 2014Minimax-optimal Inference from Partial Rankingscited by 22
  5. 2018Efficient active learning of sparse halfspacescited by 13
  6. 2017Inductive Pairwise Ranking: Going Beyond the n log(n) Barriercited by 3
  7. 2018How Many Pairwise Preferences Do We Need to Rank A Graph Consistently?cited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.