On the Sample Complexity of Rank Regression from Pairwise Comparisons
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider a rank regression setting, in which a dataset of N samples with features in ℝd is ranked by an oracle via M pairwise comparisons. Specifically, there exists a latent total ordering of the samples; when presented with a pair of samples, a noisy oracle identifies the one ranked higher with respect to the underlying total ordering. A learner observes a dataset of such comparisons and wishes to regress sample ranks from their features. We show that to learn the model parameters with ε > 0 accuracy, it suffices to conduct M ∈ Omega(dNlog3 N/ε2) comparisons uniformly at random when N is Omega(d/ε2).
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2021.
Builds on
7 of 70 references.
References · 7
- 2016Deep Learning the City : Quantifying Urban Perception At A Global Scalecited by 65
- 2015Stochastically Transitive Models for Pairwise Comparisons: Statistical and Computational Issuescited by 32
- 2017Active classification with comparison queriescited by 27
- 2014Minimax-optimal Inference from Partial Rankingscited by 22
- 2018Efficient active learning of sparse halfspacescited by 13
- 2017Inductive Pairwise Ranking: Going Beyond the n log(n) Barriercited by 3
- 2018How Many Pairwise Preferences Do We Need to Rank A Graph Consistently?cited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.
1 paper.
- 2022Differentially Private Regression with Unbounded Covariatescited by 10
- 2022Differentially Private Regression with Unbounded Covariates19 Feb 2022