mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Deep Learning Models of the Retinal Response to Natural Scenes

arXiv 1702.01825 ↗First posted 6 Feb 2017q-bio.NC stat.MLcited by 36

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A central challenge in neuroscience is to understand neural computations and circuit mechanisms that underlie the encoding of ethologically relevant, natural stimuli. In multilayered neural circuits, nonlinear processes such as synaptic transmission and spiking dynamics present a significant obstacle to the creation of accurate computational models of responses to natural stimuli. Here we demonstrate that deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) capture retinal responses to natural scenes nearly to within the variability of a cell's response, and are markedly more accurate than linear-nonlinear (LN) models and Generalized Linear Models (GLMs). Moreover, we find two additional surprising properties of CNNs: they are less susceptible to overfitting than their LN counterparts when trained on small amounts of data, and generalize better when tested on stimuli drawn from a different distribution (e.g. between natural scenes and white noise). Examination of trained CNNs reveals several properties. First, a richer set of feature maps is necessary for predicting the responses to natural scenes compared to white noise. Second, temporally precise responses to slowly varying inputs originate from feedforward inhibition, similar to known retinal mechanisms. Third, the injection of latent noise sources in intermediate layers enables our model to capture the sub-Poisson spiking variability observed in retinal ganglion cells. Fourth, augmenting our CNNs with recurrent lateral connections enables them to capture contrast adaptation as an emergent property of accurately describing retinal responses to natural scenes. These methods can be readily generalized to other sensory modalities and stimulus ensembles. Overall, this work demonstrates that CNNs not only accurately capture sensory circuit responses to natural scenes, but also yield information about the circuit's internal structure and function.

Key facts. Cited by 36 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Feb 2017.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 5; 2022: 4; 2023: 6; 2024: 3; 2025: 13; 2026: 5.

36 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Getting aligned on representational alignmentcited by 142
  2. 2025How Linguistics Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Language Modelscited by 50
  3. 2022Disentanglement with Biological Constraints: A Theory of Functional Cell Typescited by 30
  4. 2025Spiking Vision Transformer with Saccadic Attentioncited by 21
  5. 2026There Will Be a Scientific Theory of Deep Learningcited by 21
  6. 2023Exploiting Noise as a Resource for Computation and Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 17
  7. 2022The Sensorium competition on predicting large-scale mouse primary visual cortex activitycited by 13
  8. 2025Brain-Model Evaluations Need the NeuroAI Turing Testcited by 12
  9. 2025Better artificial intelligence does not mean better models of biologycited by 10
  10. 2021Biologically Plausible Training Mechanisms for Self-Supervised Learning in Deep Networkscited by 6
  11. 2021Fitting summary statistics of neural data with a differentiable spiking network simulatorcited by 5
  12. 2021Deep Auto-encoder with Neural Responsecited by 5
24 more
  1. 2023Temporal Conditioning Spiking Latent Variable Models of the Neural Response to Natural Visual Scenescited by 4
  2. 2025Unraveling the geometry of visual relational reasoningcited by 3
  3. 2023Most discriminative stimuli for functional cell type clusteringcited by 2
  4. 2025Neural Ganglion Sensors: Learning Task-specific Event Cameras Inspired by the Neural Circuit of the Human Retinacited by 2
  5. 2022Machine Learning Method for Functional Assessment of Retinal Modelscited by 1
  6. 2024Signal Processing in the Retina: Interpretable Graph Classifier to Predict Ganglion Cell Responsescited by 1
  7. 2024Explicitly Modeling Pre-Cortical Vision with a Neuro-Inspired Front-End Improves CNN Robustnesscited by 1
  8. 2021Fine-Grained System Identification of Nonlinear Neural Circuitscited by 0
  9. 2021Variational framework for partially-measured physical system control: examples of vision neuroscience and optical random mediacited by 0
  10. 2022Integrating Statistical and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Receptive Field Structure in Neural Populationscited by 0
  11. 2023Scaling and Resizing Symmetry in Feedforward Networkscited by 0
  12. 2023Visual attention information can be traced on cortical response but not on the retina: evidence from electrophysiological mouse data using natural images as stimulicited by 0
  13. 2024Exploring Biological Neuronal Correlations with Quantum Generative Modelscited by 0
  14. 2025Higher-Order Convolution Improves Neural Predictivity in the Retinacited by 0
  15. 2025MEIcoder: Decoding Visual Stimuli from Neural Activity by Leveraging Most Exciting Inputscited by 0
  16. 2025Language models as tools for investigating the distinction between possible and impossible natural languagescited by 0
  17. 2025Large language models have learned to use languagecited by 0
  18. 2025Large language models are not about natural languagecited by 0
  19. 2025Linguists should learn to love speech-based deep learning modelscited by 0
  20. 2025AVM: Towards Structure-Preserving Neural Response Modeling in the Visual Cortex Across Stimuli and Individualscited by 0
  21. 2026Are Language Models Models?cited by 0
  22. 2026Across the Levels of Analysis: Explaining Predictive Processing in Humans Requires More Than Machine-Estimated Probabilitiescited by 0
  23. 2026You Can't Fight in Here! This is BBS!cited by 0
  24. 2026Not-So-Strange Love: Language Models and Generative Linguistic Theories are More Compatible than They Appearcited by 0