Fitting summary statistics of neural data with a differentiable spiking network simulator
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fitting network models to neural activity is an important tool in neuroscience. A popular approach is to model a brain area with a probabilistic recurrent spiking network whose parameters maximize the likelihood of the recorded activity. Although this is widely used, we show that the resulting model does not produce realistic neural activity. To correct for this, we suggest to augment the log-likelihood with terms that measure the dissimilarity between simulated and recorded activity. This dissimilarity is defined via summary statistics commonly used in neuroscience and the optimization is efficient because it relies on back-propagation through the stochastically simulated spike trains. We analyze this method theoretically and show empirically that it generates more realistic activity statistics. We find that it improves upon other fitting algorithms for spiking network models like GLMs (Generalized Linear Models) which do not usually rely on back-propagation. This new fitting algorithm also enables the consideration of hidden neurons which is otherwise notoriously hard, and we show that it can be crucial when trying to infer the network connectivity from spike recordings.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2021.
Builds on
16 of 50 references.
References · 16
- 2013Estimating or Propagating Gradients Through Stochastic Neurons for Conditional Computationcited by 2,079
- 2016The Concrete Distribution: A Continuous Relaxation of Discrete Random Variablescited by 1,148
- 2019Surrogate Gradient Learning in Spiking Neural Networkscited by 626
- 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 502
- 2015Generative Moment Matching Networkscited by 257
- 2018Long short-term memory and learning-to-learn in networks of spiking neuronscited by 181
- 2020DDSP: Differentiable Digital Signal Processingcited by 178
- 2017Flexible statistical inference for mechanistic models of neural dynamicscited by 163
- 2017REBAR: Low-variance, unbiased gradient estimates for discrete latent variable modelscited by 79
- 2016Fast ε-free Inference of Simulation Models with Bayesian Conditional Density Estimationcited by 52
- 2017Deep Learning Models of the Retinal Response to Natural Scenescited by 36
- 2016LFADS - Latent Factor Analysis via Dynamical Systemscited by 30
4 more
- 2014Techniques for Learning Binary Stochastic Feedforward Neural Networkscited by 14
- 2020Rescuing neural spike train models from bad MLEcited by 6
- 2020A new inference approach for training shallow and deep generalized linear models of noisy interacting neuronscited by 3
- 2019Predicting synchronous firing of large neural populations from sequential recordingscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2023Temporal Conditioning Spiking Latent Variable Models of the Neural Response to Natural Visual Scenescited by 4
- 2026Linguistics and Human Brain: A Perspective of Computational Neurosciencecited by 4
- 2022Mesoscopic modeling of hidden spiking neuronscited by 2
- 2024Spiking Music: Audio Compression with Event Based Auto-encoderscited by 1
- 2024Exploring Biological Neuronal Correlations with Quantum Generative Modelscited by 0
- 2026Linguistics and Human Brain: A Perspective of Computational Neuroscience9 Feb 2026
- 2024Exploring Biological Neuronal Correlations with Quantum Generative Models13 Sep 2024
- 2024Spiking Music: Audio Compression with Event Based Auto-encoders2 Feb 2024
- 2023Temporal Conditioning Spiking Latent Variable Models of the Neural Response to Natural Visual Scenes21 Jun 2023
- 2022Mesoscopic modeling of hidden spiking neurons26 May 2022