mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Sensorium competition on predicting large-scale mouse primary visual cortex activity

arXiv 2206.08666 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2022q-bio.NC cs.AI cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The neural underpinning of the biological visual system is challenging to study experimentally, in particular as the neuronal activity becomes increasingly nonlinear with respect to visual input. Artificial neural networks (ANNs) can serve a variety of goals for improving our understanding of this complex system, not only serving as predictive digital twins of sensory cortex for novel hypothesis generation in silico, but also incorporating bio-inspired architectural motifs to progressively bridge the gap between biological and machine vision. The mouse has recently emerged as a popular model system to study visual information processing, but no standardized large-scale benchmark to identify state-of-the-art models of the mouse visual system has been established. To fill this gap, we propose the Sensorium benchmark competition. We collected a large-scale dataset from mouse primary visual cortex containing the responses of more than 28,000 neurons across seven mice stimulated with thousands of natural images, together with simultaneous behavioral measurements that include running speed, pupil dilation, and eye movements. The benchmark challenge will rank models based on predictive performance for neuronal responses on a held-out test set, and includes two tracks for model input limited to either stimulus only (Sensorium) or stimulus plus behavior (Sensorium+). We provide a starting kit to lower the barrier for entry, including tutorials, pre-trained baseline models, and APIs with one line commands for data loading and submission. We would like to see this as a starting point for regular challenges and data releases, and as a standard tool for measuring progress in large-scale neural system identification models of the mouse visual system and beyond.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2022.

Builds on

16 of 60 references.

References · 16

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  5. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
  6. 2018Markerless tracking of user-defined features with deep learningcited by 203
  7. 2021Neural Latents Benchmark '21: Evaluating latent variable models of neural population activitycited by 57
  8. 2014Deep Neural Networks Rival the Representation of Primate IT Cortex for Core Visual Object Recognitioncited by 50
  9. 2019Learning From Brains How to Regularize Machinescited by 37
  10. 2017Deep Learning Models of the Retinal Response to Natural Scenescited by 36
  11. 2017Neural system identification for large populations separating "what" and "where"cited by 28
  12. 2021Towards robust vision by multi-task learning on monkey visual cortexcited by 28
4 more
  1. 2021The Algonauts Project 2021 Challenge: How the Human Brain Makes Sense of a World in Motioncited by 17
  2. 2018A rotation-equivariant convolutional neural network model of primary visual cortexcited by 15
  3. 2017Using deep learning to reveal the neural code for images in primary visual cortexcited by 4
  4. 2020High-contrast "gaudy" images improve the training of deep neural network models of visual cortexcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 6; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.

13 papers.

Sort: