An application of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices for ranking top tennis players
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Pairwise comparison is an important tool in multi-attribute decision making. Pairwise comparison matrices (PCM) have been applied for ranking criteria and for scoring alternatives according to a given criterion. Our paper presents a special application of incomplete PCMs: ranking of professional tennis players based on their results against each other. The selected 25 players have been on the top of the ATP rankings for a shorter or longer period in the last 40 years. Some of them have never met on the court. One of the aims of the paper is to provide ranking of the selected players, however, the analysis of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices is also in the focus. The eigenvector method and the logarithmic least squares method were used to calculate weights from incomplete PCMs. In our results the top three players of four decades were Nadal, Federer and Sampras. Some questions have been raised on the properties of incomplete PCMs and remains open for further investigation.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 Nov 2016.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
10 papers.
- 2021Inconsistency thresholds for incomplete pairwise comparison matricescited by 5
- 2022Ranking with Confidence for Large Scale Comparison Datacited by 3
- 2024Statistical inference for pairwise comparison modelscited by 2
- 2026What Does Preference Learning Recover from Pairwise Comparison Data?cited by 2
- 2022Principal Trade-off Analysiscited by 0
- 2024Beyond Suspension: A Two-phase Methodology for Concluding Sports Leaguescited by 0
- 2024An Overview and Comparison of Axiomatization Structures Regarding Inconsistency Indices' Properties in Pairwise Comparisons Methodscited by 0
- 2025An experimental approach: The graph of graphscited by 0
- 2025Capturing Intransitive Dominance in Tennis Forecasting: A Graph Neural Network Approachcited by 0
- 2026Convergence analysis of a family of Zermelo-type iterations for the Bradley--Terry modelcited by 0
- 2026Convergence analysis of a family of Zermelo-type iterations for the Bradley--Terry model24 Jul 2026
- 2026What Does Preference Learning Recover from Pairwise Comparison Data?10 Feb 2026
- 2025Capturing Intransitive Dominance in Tennis Forecasting: A Graph Neural Network Approach23 Oct 2025
- 2025An experimental approach: The graph of graphs24 Aug 2025
- 2024An Overview and Comparison of Axiomatization Structures Regarding Inconsistency Indices' Properties in Pairwise Comparisons Methods23 Aug 2024
- 2024Beyond Suspension: A Two-phase Methodology for Concluding Sports Leagues29 Mar 2024
- 2024Statistical inference for pairwise comparison models16 Jan 2024
- 2022Principal Trade-off Analysis9 Jun 2022
- 2022Ranking with Confidence for Large Scale Comparison Data3 Feb 2022
- 2021Inconsistency thresholds for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices21 Feb 2021