mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Convergence analysis of a family of Zermelo-type iterations for the Bradley--Terry model

arXiv 2607.22221 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2026stat.ML cs.LG cs.NAcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Zermelo's algorithm is a classical method for computing the maximum likelihood estimator in the Bradley--Terry (BT) model, but its convergence can be slow in practice. To accelerate computation, Newman introduced a family of Zermelo-type fixed-point iterations parameterized by α, with Zermelo's algorithm recovered at α=1. Empirical evidence suggests that the choice α=0 often converges substantially faster, making it a promising alternative, yet the mechanism underlying this acceleration remains elusive. This paper provides theoretical insight into this phenomenon through a systematic local convergence analysis. We derive closed-form expressions for local convergence factors under synchronous and asynchronous updates and analyze their dependence on α via spectral analysis of the associated Jacobian matrices. For synchronous updates, we show that the algorithm may fail to converge when α<1, and its local convergence factor is quasi-convex in α under the population BT model. In contrast, asynchronous updates are always locally convergent, and their local convergence factor is provably monotonically increasing in α under the population BT model of consistently ordered bipartite comparison graphs, establishing the optimality of α=0 in this setting. We further establish asymptotic approximation results for the population convergence factors under the BT model, justifying their practical relevance. Numerical experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets confirm the theory. Our analysis complements existing convergence results and shows that the acceleration of α=0 arises not only from the parameter choice but, more importantly, from the use of asynchronous updates.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2026.

Builds on

15 of 50 references.

References · 15

  1. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  2. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,912
  3. 2017Community Detection and Stochastic Block Modelscited by 319
  4. 2017Spectral Method and Regularized MLE Are Both Optimal for Top-K Rankingcited by 47
  5. 2022Efficient computation of rankings from pairwise comparisonscited by 31
  6. 2021Uncertainty quantification in the Bradley-Terry-Luce modelcited by 29
  7. 2021Item Response Theory -- A Statistical Framework for Educational and Psychological Measurementcited by 17
  8. 2021Optimal Full Ranking from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 16
  9. 2016An application of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices for ranking top tennis playerscited by 11
  10. 2023A unified analysis of likelihood-based estimators in the Plackett--Luce modelcited by 9
  11. 2020A General Pairwise Comparison Model for Extremely Sparse Networkscited by 8
  12. 2023On Sinkhorn's Algorithm and Choice Modelingcited by 6
3 more
  1. 2024Statistical ranking with dynamic covariatescited by 6
  2. 2026Recent advances in the Bradley--Terry Model: theory, algorithms, and applicationscited by 6
  3. 2013Statistical Modelling of Citation Exchange Between Statistics Journalscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.