mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Inconsistency thresholds for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices

arXiv 2102.10558 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2021math.ST cs.AI math.OCcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pairwise comparison matrices are increasingly used in settings where some pairs are missing. However, there exist few inconsistency indices for similar incomplete data sets and no reasonable measure has an associated threshold. This paper generalises the famous rule of thumb for the acceptable level of inconsistency, proposed by Saaty, to incomplete pairwise comparison matrices. The extension is based on choosing the missing elements such that the maximal eigenvalue of the incomplete matrix is minimised. Consequently, the well-established values of the random index cannot be adopted: the inconsistency of random matrices is found to be the function of matrix size and the number of missing elements, with a nearly linear dependence in the case of the latter variable. Our results can be directly built into decision-making software and used by practitioners as a statistical criterion for accepting or rejecting an incomplete pairwise comparison matrix.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2021.

Builds on

6 of 41 references.

References · 6

  1. 2016An application of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices for ranking top tennis playerscited by 11
  2. 2019On the monotonicity of the eigenvector methodcited by 7
  3. 2015On the ranking of a Swiss system chess team tournamentcited by 4
  4. 2020Filling in pattern designs for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices: (quasi-)regular graphs with minimal diametercited by 4
  5. 2019Revenue allocation in Formula One: a pairwise comparison approachcited by 2
  6. 2013On reducing inconsistency of pairwise comparison matrices below an acceptance thresholdcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

5 papers.