mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Trinary Tools for Continuously Valued Binary Classifiers

arXiv 2204.08136 ↗First posted 18 Apr 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Classification methods for binary (yes/no) tasks often produce a continuously valued score. Machine learning practitioners must perform model selection, calibration, discretization, performance assessment, tuning, and fairness assessment. Such tasks involve examining classifier results, typically using summary statistics and manual examination of details. In this paper, we provide an interactive visualization approach to support such continuously-valued classifier examination tasks. Our approach addresses the three phases of these tasks: calibration, operating point selection, and examination. We enhance standard views and introduce task-specific views so that they can be integrated into a multi-view coordination (MVC) system. We build on an existing comparison-based approach, extending it to continuous classifiers by treating the continuous values as trinary (positive, unsure, negative) even if the classifier will not ultimately use the 3-way classification. We provide use cases that demonstrate how our approach enables machine learning practitioners to accomplish key tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Apr 2022.

Builds on

15 of 51 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2016The Mythos of Model Interpretabilitycited by 716
  3. 2020Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlationcited by 420
  4. 2019The What-If Tool: Interactive Probing of Machine Learning Modelscited by 207
  5. 2018To Trust Or Not To Trust A Classifiercited by 205
  6. 2019FairVis: Visual Analytics for Discovering Intersectional Bias in Machine Learningcited by 93
  7. 2019FairSight: Visual Analytics for Fairness in Decision Makingcited by 59
  8. 2018Manifold: A Model-Agnostic Framework for Interpretation and Diagnosis of Machine Learning Modelscited by 50
  9. 2020ViCE: Visual Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning Modelscited by 34
  10. 2020Boxer: Interactive Comparison of Classifier Resultscited by 28
  11. 2015Performance measures for classification systems with rejectioncited by 16
  12. 2020mage: Fluid Moves Between Code and Graphical Work in Computational Notebookscited by 13
3 more
  1. 2020Temporal Probability Calibrationcited by 5
  2. 2020HypoML: Visual Analysis for Hypothesis-based Evaluation of Machine Learning Modelscited by 5
  3. 2018Visual Designs for Binned Aggregation of Multi-Class Scatterplotscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.