A Meta-heuristic Approach to Estimate and Explain Classifier Uncertainty
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Trust is a crucial factor affecting the adoption of machine learning (ML) models. Qualitative studies have revealed that end-users, particularly in the medical domain, need models that can express their uncertainty in decision-making allowing users to know when to ignore the model's recommendations. However, existing approaches for quantifying decision-making uncertainty are not model-agnostic, or they rely on complex statistical derivations that are not easily understood by laypersons or end-users, making them less useful for explaining the model's decision-making process. This work proposes a set of class-independent meta-heuristics that can characterize the complexity of an instance in terms of factors are mutually relevant to both human and ML decision-making. The measures are integrated into a meta-learning framework that estimates the risk of misclassification. The proposed framework outperformed predicted probabilities in identifying instances at risk of being misclassified. The proposed measures and framework hold promise for improving model development for more complex instances, as well as providing a new means of model abstention and explanation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Apr 2023.
Builds on
19 of 99 references.
References · 19
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2019Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty in Machine Learning: An Introduction to Concepts and Methodscited by 903
- 2019Confident Learning: Estimating Uncertainty in Dataset Labelscited by 411
- 2020Effect of Confidence and Explanation on Accuracy and Trust Calibration in AI-Assisted Decision Makingcited by 281
- 2019What Clinicians Want: Contextualizing Explainable Machine Learning for Clinical End Usecited by 134
- 2022TalkToModel: Explaining Machine Learning Models with Interactive Natural Language Conversationscited by 65
- 2019Unremarkable AI: Fitting Intelligent Decision Support into Critical, Clinical Decision-Making Processescited by 53
- 2020Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty with Random Forestscited by 42
- 2020CheXplain: Enabling Physicians to Explore and UnderstandData-Driven, AI-Enabled Medical Imaging Analysiscited by 40
- 2022Sensible AI: Re-imagining Interpretability and Explainability using Sensemaking Theorycited by 32
7 more
- 2019Can You Trust This Prediction? Auditing Pointwise Reliability After Learningcited by 28
- 2020Misplaced Trust: Measuring the Interference of Machine Learning in Human Decision-Makingcited by 25
- 2018META-DES: A Dynamic Ensemble Selection Framework using Meta-Learningcited by 21
- 2015Performance measures for classification systems with rejectioncited by 16
- 2014An ensemble-based system for automatic screening of diabetic retinopathycited by 14
- 2020Trajectories, bifurcations and pseudotime in large clinical datasets: applications to myocardial infarction and diabetes datacited by 13
- 2018Dynamic Ensemble Selection VS K-NN: why and when Dynamic Selection obtains higher classification performance?cited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.