Optimizing The Integrator Step Size for Hamiltonian Monte Carlo
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hamiltonian Monte Carlo can provide powerful inference in complex statistical problems, but ultimately its performance is sensitive to various tuning parameters. In this paper we use the underlying geometry of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo to construct a universal optimization criteria for tuning the step size of the symplectic integrator crucial to any implementation of the algorithm as well as diagnostics to monitor for any signs of invalidity. An immediate outcome of this result is that the suggested target average acceptance probability of 0.651 can be relaxed to 0.6 lesssim a lesssim 0.9 with larger values more robust in practice.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 24 Nov 2014.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 0; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
8 papers.
- 2021A Survey of Monte Carlo Methods for Parameter Estimationcited by 23
- 2023When does Metropolized Hamiltonian Monte Carlo provably outperform Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm?cited by 12
- 2024GIST: Gibbs self-tuning for locally adaptive Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 9
- 2021An Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Method for Samplingcited by 8
- 2023Randomized Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Uncertainty Quantification in High-Dimensional Inverse Problemscited by 3
- 2024Hamiltonian Monte Carlo on ReLU Neural Networks is Inefficientcited by 1
- 2025Understanding the Trade-offs in Accuracy and Uncertainty Quantification: Architecture and Inference Choices in Bayesian Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Posterior sampling by source-space MCMC via prior-based few-step transport mapscited by 0
- 2026Posterior sampling by source-space MCMC via prior-based few-step transport maps1 Oct 2026
- 2025Understanding the Trade-offs in Accuracy and Uncertainty Quantification: Architecture and Inference Choices in Bayesian Neural Networks14 Mar 2025
- 2024Hamiltonian Monte Carlo on ReLU Neural Networks is Inefficient29 Oct 2024
- 2024GIST: Gibbs self-tuning for locally adaptive Hamiltonian Monte Carlo23 Apr 2024
- 2023Randomized Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Uncertainty Quantification in High-Dimensional Inverse Problems11 Dec 2023
- 2023When does Metropolized Hamiltonian Monte Carlo provably outperform Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm?10 Apr 2023
- 2021An Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlo Method for Sampling27 Aug 2021
- 2021A Survey of Monte Carlo Methods for Parameter Estimation25 Jul 2021