mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Randomized Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Uncertainty Quantification in High-Dimensional Inverse Problems

arXiv 2312.06177 ↗First posted 11 Dec 2023cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a physics-informed machine learning method for uncertainty quantification in high-dimensional inverse problems. In this method, the states and parameters of partial differential equations (PDEs) are approximated with truncated conditional Karhunen-Lo`eve expansions (CKLEs), which, by construction, match the measurements of the respective variables. The maximum a posteriori (MAP) solution of the inverse problem is formulated as a minimization problem over CKLE coefficients where the loss function is the sum of the norm of PDE residuals and the ℓ2 regularization term. This MAP formulation is known as the physics-informed CKLE (PICKLE) method. Uncertainty in the inverse solution is quantified in terms of the posterior distribution of CKLE coefficients, and we sample the posterior by solving a randomized PICKLE minimization problem, formulated by adding zero-mean Gaussian perturbations in the PICKLE loss function. We call the proposed approach the randomized PICKLE (rPICKLE) method. For linear and low-dimensional nonlinear problems (15 CKLE parameters), we show analytically and through comparison with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) that the rPICKLE posterior converges to the true posterior given by the Bayes rule. For high-dimensional non-linear problems with 2000 CKLE parameters, we numerically demonstrate that rPICKLE posteriors are highly informative--they provide mean estimates with an accuracy comparable to the estimates given by the MAP solution and the confidence interval that mostly covers the reference solution. We are not able to obtain the HMC posterior to validate rPICKLE's convergence to the true posterior due to the HMC's prohibitive computational cost for the considered high-dimensional problems. Our results demonstrate the advantages of rPICKLE over HMC for approximately sampling high-dimensional posterior distributions subject to physics constraints.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Dec 2023.

Builds on

8 of 42 references.

References · 8

  1. 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
  2. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,472
  3. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
  4. 2017A Conceptual Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 209
  5. 2019Quality of Uncertainty Quantification for Bayesian Neural Network Inferencecited by 59
  6. 2014Optimizing The Integrator Step Size for Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 8
  7. 2022Physics-Informed Neural Network Method for Parabolic Differential Equations with Sharply Perturbed Initial Conditionscited by 7
  8. 2021Physics-Informed Machine Learning Method for Large-Scale Data Assimilation Problemscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

3 papers.