mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

When does Metropolized Hamiltonian Monte Carlo provably outperform Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm?

arXiv 2304.04724 ↗First posted 10 Apr 2023stat.CO cs.CC stat.MLcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We analyze the mixing time of Metropolized Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) with the leapfrog integrator to sample from a distribution on ℝd whose log-density is smooth, has Lipschitz Hessian in Frobenius norm and satisfies isoperimetry. We bound the gradient complexity to reach ε error in total variation distance from a warm start by tilde O(d1/4polylog(1/ε)) and demonstrate the benefit of choosing the number of leapfrog steps to be larger than 1. To surpass the previous analysis on Metropolis-adjusted Langevin algorithm (MALA) that has tildeO(d1/2polylog(1/ε)) dimension dependency [WSC22], we reveal a key feature in our proof that the joint distribution of the location and velocity variables of the discretization of the continuous HMC dynamics stays approximately invariant. This key feature, when shown via induction over the number of leapfrog steps, enables us to obtain estimates on moments of various quantities that appear in the acceptance rate control of Metropolized HMC. Notably, our analysis does not require log-concavity or independence of the marginals, and only relies on an isoperimetric inequality. To illustrate the relevance of the Lipschitz Hessian in Frobenius norm assumption, several examples that fall into our framework are discussed.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Apr 2023.

Builds on

26 of 78 references.

References · 26

  1. 2016TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systemscited by 660
  2. 2019Rapid Convergence of the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithm: Isoperimetry Sufficescited by 224
  3. 2014Theoretical guarantees for approximate sampling from smooth and log-concave densitiescited by 206
  4. 2015Non-asymptotic convergence analysis for the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithmcited by 195
  5. 2016High-dimensional Bayesian inference via the Unadjusted Langevin Algorithmcited by 144
  6. 2018Log-concave sampling: Metropolis-Hastings algorithms are fastcited by 117
  7. 2017Convergence of Langevin MCMC in KL-divergencecited by 86
  8. 2020Structured Logconcave Sampling with a Restricted Gaussian Oraclecited by 85
  9. 2019The Randomized Midpoint Method for Log-Concave Samplingcited by 77
  10. 2022Mean-Field Langevin Dynamics: Exponential Convergence and Annealingcited by 60
  11. 2020Optimal dimension dependence of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithmcited by 57
  12. 2019Fast mixing of Metropolized Hamiltonian Monte Carlo: Benefits of multi-step gradientscited by 51
14 more
  1. 2021Minimax Mixing Time of the Metropolis-Adjusted Langevin Algorithm for Log-Concave Samplingcited by 44
  2. 2023Faster high-accuracy log-concave sampling via algorithmic warm startscited by 44
  3. 2018Coupling and Convergence for Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 36
  4. 2019High-Order Langevin Diffusion Yields an Accelerated MCMC Algorithmcited by 36
  5. 2019Optimal Convergence Rate of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for Strongly Logconcave Distributionscited by 28
  6. 2020Logsmooth Gradient Concentration and Tighter Runtimes for Metropolized Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 22
  7. 2022Resolving the Mixing Time of the Langevin Algorithm to its Stationary Distribution for Log-Concave Samplingcited by 21
  8. 2021Lower Bounds on Metropolized Sampling Methods for Well-Conditioned Distributionscited by 19
  9. 2021Mixing Time Guarantees for Unadjusted Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 18
  10. 2017Rapid Mixing of Hamiltonian Monte Carlo on Strongly Log-Concave Distributionscited by 12
  11. 2019Strong Self-Concordance and Samplingcited by 11
  12. 2014Optimizing The Integrator Step Size for Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 8
  13. 2022Unadjusted Hamiltonian MCMC with Stratified Monte Carlo Time Integrationcited by 8
  14. 2022Mean-Field Analysis of Two-Layer Neural Networks: Global Optimality with Linear Convergence Ratescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 8; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

12 papers.