mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Convex Calibration Dimension for Multiclass Loss Matrices

arXiv 1408.2764 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2014cs.LG stat.MLcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study consistency properties of surrogate loss functions for general multiclass learning problems, defined by a general multiclass loss matrix. We extend the notion of classification calibration, which has been studied for binary and multiclass 0-1 classification problems (and for certain other specific learning problems), to the general multiclass setting, and derive necessary and sufficient conditions for a surrogate loss to be calibrated with respect to a loss matrix in this setting. We then introduce the notion of convex calibration dimension of a multiclass loss matrix, which measures the smallest `size' of a prediction space in which it is possible to design a convex surrogate that is calibrated with respect to the loss matrix. We derive both upper and lower bounds on this quantity, and use these results to analyze various loss matrices. In particular, we apply our framework to study various subset ranking losses, and use the convex calibration dimension as a tool to show both the existence and non-existence of various types of convex calibrated surrogates for these losses. Our results strengthen recent results of Duchi et al. (2010) and Calauzenes et al. (2012) on the non-existence of certain types of convex calibrated surrogates in subset ranking. We anticipate the convex calibration dimension may prove to be a useful tool in the study and design of surrogate losses for general multiclass learning problems.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2014.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 2; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

21 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2023Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applicationscited by 206
  2. 2023In Defense of Softmax Parametrization for Calibrated and Consistent Learning to Defercited by 26
  3. 2024Enhanced H-Consistency Boundscited by 18
  4. 2022An Embedding Framework for the Design and Analysis of Consistent Polyhedral Surrogatescited by 14
  5. 2021Training Over-parameterized Models with Non-decomposable Objectivescited by 11
  6. 2022Consistent Polyhedral Surrogates for Top-k Classification and Variantscited by 8
  7. 2022The Structured Abstain Problem and the Lov'asz Hingecited by 7
  8. 2023On Classification-Calibration of Gamma-Phi Lossescited by 6
  9. 2023Understanding Uncertainty Sampling via Equivalent Losscited by 5
  10. 2021Unifying Lower Bounds on Prediction Dimension of Consistent Convex Surrogatescited by 4
  11. 2021OpReg-Boost: Learning to Accelerate Online Algorithms with Operator Regressioncited by 1
  12. 2022Learning from Positive and Unlabeled Data with Augmented Classescited by 1
9 more
  1. 2024Trading off Consistency and Dimensionality of Convex Surrogates for the Modecited by 1
  2. 2025Contrasting Cost-Agnostic and Cost-Sensitive Losses under Limited Model Capacity via mathcal H-consistencycited by 1
  3. 2025Consistency Conditions for Differentiable Surrogate Lossescited by 1
  4. 2026Exact Rank and Convex Calibration Dimension Lower Bounds for the Multi-Label F1 Losscited by 1
  5. 2025Structured Prediction with Abstention via the Lov'asz Hingecited by 0
  6. 2025On Next-Token Prediction in LLMs: How End Goals Determine the Consistency of Decoding Algorithmscited by 0
  7. 2026Smoothed Elicitation Complexity for Approximate Gamma-calibration of Discrete Classification Taskscited by 0
  8. 2026Exponential Convex Calibration Dimension for the Multi-Label Jaccard Measurecited by 0
  9. 2026Common Geodesics Do Not Guarantee Fisher Consistency of the Structured SVM: Minimal Counterexamples and a Tree-Metric Classificationcited by 0