mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exact Rank and Convex Calibration Dimension Lower Bounds for the Multi-Label F1 Loss

arXiv 2608.08399 ↗First posted 9 Aug 2026cs.LG stat.MLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The instance-wise F1 measure is a central performance measure for multi-label classification. For a problem with s labels, it defines a 2s× 2s loss matrix. Previous work exhibited s2+1-coordinate affine and shifted low-rank representations and used them to construct quadratic-dimensional convex calibrated surrogates. We determine the exact rank. Under the convention F1(varnothing,varnothing)=1, the F1 score matrix, the shifted loss matrix, and the unshifted loss matrix all have rank s2-s+2, while the column-affine dimension of the loss is s2-s+1. The proof factors the nonempty score matrix through subset-incidence matrices and a positive-definite Cauchy matrix. Exact rank does not, by itself, lower-bound the dimension of an arbitrary convex calibrated surrogate. We therefore analyze the Bayes geometry of F1 directly. We construct a distribution for which precisely all supersets of a fixed core label set are Bayes optimal, and show that the corresponding active loss columns, restricted to the witness support, have affine dimension hn, where n=s-lfloor s/3rfloor and h=lceil(slfloor s/3rfloor)1/2rceil-1. Applying the feasible-subspace lower bound for convex calibration dimension gives [ operatornameCCdim(LF1) ≥ left(frac23√3-o(1)right)s2. ] Together with the quadratic upper bound, this establishes operatornameCCdim(LF1)=Theta(s2).

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2026.

Builds on

5 of 17 references.

References · 5

  1. 2014Convex Calibration Dimension for Multiclass Loss Matricescited by 21
  2. 2020Convex Calibrated Surrogates for the Multi-Label F-Measurecited by 18
  3. 2013On the Bayes-optimality of F-measure maximizerscited by 16
  4. 2022An Embedding Framework for the Design and Analysis of Consistent Polyhedral Surrogatescited by 14
  5. 2018Sharp Analysis of Learning with Discrete Lossescited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.