mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Common Geodesics Do Not Guarantee Fisher Consistency of the Structured SVM: Minimal Counterexamples and a Tree-Metric Classification

arXiv 2608.27203 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A known necessary condition for Fisher consistency of the structured support vector machine requires the task loss to be a metric for which every output triple has a common geodesic point. We show that this condition is not sufficient for the canonical coordinate-wise argmax decoder. A four-output unit star admits an exactly optimal score vector whose maximizers are all strictly non-Bayes, and four outputs are minimal among metrics satisfying the condition. We then completely classify positively weighted tree metrics whose vertex set is the output space: argmax consistency holds if and only if the tree is a path. The failure on branching trees is confined to boundary distributions; every tree retains the argmax property at every full-support distribution. Among metrics satisfying the common-geodesic condition, five outputs are necessary and sufficient for a full-support counterexample; K2,3 is the smallest member of an infinite Km,n family. We additionally give a full-support counterexample for the three-dimensional Hamming cube. All optimality claims have exact primal-dual certificates. The counterexamples expose a concrete decoder gap: in this polyhedral setting, an embedding can guarantee the existence of a calibrated link without validating a prescribed argmax link on every surrogate-risk minimizer.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.

Builds on

6 of 17 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017On Structured Prediction Theory with Calibrated Convex Surrogate Lossescited by 23
  2. 2014Convex Calibration Dimension for Multiclass Loss Matricescited by 21
  3. 2019An Embedding Framework for Consistent Polyhedral Surrogatescited by 21
  4. 2022An Embedding Framework for the Design and Analysis of Consistent Polyhedral Surrogatescited by 14
  5. 2020Consistent Structured Prediction with Max-Min Margin Markov Networkscited by 9
  6. 2021On the Consistency of Max-Margin Lossescited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.