Common Geodesics Do Not Guarantee Fisher Consistency of the Structured SVM: Minimal Counterexamples and a Tree-Metric Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A known necessary condition for Fisher consistency of the structured support vector machine requires the task loss to be a metric for which every output triple has a common geodesic point. We show that this condition is not sufficient for the canonical coordinate-wise argmax decoder. A four-output unit star admits an exactly optimal score vector whose maximizers are all strictly non-Bayes, and four outputs are minimal among metrics satisfying the condition. We then completely classify positively weighted tree metrics whose vertex set is the output space: argmax consistency holds if and only if the tree is a path. The failure on branching trees is confined to boundary distributions; every tree retains the argmax property at every full-support distribution. Among metrics satisfying the common-geodesic condition, five outputs are necessary and sufficient for a full-support counterexample; K2,3 is the smallest member of an infinite Km,n family. We additionally give a full-support counterexample for the three-dimensional Hamming cube. All optimality claims have exact primal-dual certificates. The counterexamples expose a concrete decoder gap: in this polyhedral setting, an embedding can guarantee the existence of a calibrated link without validating a prescribed argmax link on every surrogate-risk minimizer.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2026.
Builds on
6 of 17 references.
References · 6
- 2017On Structured Prediction Theory with Calibrated Convex Surrogate Lossescited by 23
- 2014Convex Calibration Dimension for Multiclass Loss Matricescited by 21
- 2019An Embedding Framework for Consistent Polyhedral Surrogatescited by 21
- 2022An Embedding Framework for the Design and Analysis of Consistent Polyhedral Surrogatescited by 14
- 2020Consistent Structured Prediction with Max-Min Margin Markov Networkscited by 9
- 2021On the Consistency of Max-Margin Lossescited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.