mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Private Everlasting Prediction

arXiv 2305.09579 ↗First posted 16 May 2023cs.LG cs.CR cs.DScited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

A private learner is trained on a sample of labeled points and generates a hypothesis that can be used for predicting the labels of newly sampled points while protecting the privacy of the training set [Kasiviswannathan et al., FOCS 2008]. Research uncovered that private learners may need to exhibit significantly higher sample complexity than non-private learners as is the case with, e.g., learning of one-dimensional threshold functions [Bun et al., FOCS 2015, Alon et al., STOC 2019]. We explore prediction as an alternative to learning. Instead of putting forward a hypothesis, a predictor answers a stream of classification queries. Earlier work has considered a private prediction model with just a single classification query [Dwork and Feldman, COLT 2018]. We observe that when answering a stream of queries, a predictor must modify the hypothesis it uses over time, and, furthermore, that it must use the queries for this modification, hence introducing potential privacy risks with respect to the queries themselves. We introduce private everlasting prediction taking into account the privacy of both the training set and the (adaptively chosen) queries made to the predictor. We then present a generic construction of private everlasting predictors in the PAC model. The sample complexity of the initial training sample in our construction is quadratic (up to polylog factors) in the VC dimension of the concept class. Our construction allows prediction for all concept classes with finite VC dimension, and in particular threshold functions with constant size initial training sample, even when considered over infinite domains, whereas it is known that the sample complexity of privately learning threshold functions must grow as a function of the domain size and hence is impossible for infinite domains.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 May 2023.

Builds on

16 of 29 references.

References · 16

  1. 2020When is Memorization of Irrelevant Training Data Necessary for High-Accuracy Learning?cited by 104
  2. 2018Private PAC learning implies finite Littlestone dimensioncited by 74
  3. 2014Private Learning and Sanitization: Pure vs. Approximate Differential Privacycited by 63
  4. 2015Differentially Private Release and Learning of Threshold Functionscited by 60
  5. 2018Privacy-preserving Predictioncited by 48
  6. 2014Sample Complexity Bounds on Differentially Private Learning via Communication Complexitycited by 31
  7. 2019Privately Learning Thresholds: Closing the Exponential Gapcited by 31
  8. 2016Make Up Your Mind: The Price of Online Queries in Differential Privacycited by 26
  9. 2014Characterizing the Sample Complexity of Private Learnerscited by 19
  10. 2019Privately Answering Classification Queries in the Agnostic PAC Modelcited by 18
  11. 2022~Optimal Differentially Private Learning of Thresholds and Quasi-Concave Optimizationcited by 18
  12. 2020Closure Properties for Private Classification and Online Predictioncited by 16
4 more
  1. 2014Learning Privately with Labeled and Unlabeled Examplescited by 10
  2. 2019PAC learning with stable and private predictionscited by 9
  3. 2015Robust Mediators in Large Gamescited by 7
  4. 2015Order-Revealing Encryption and the Hardness of Private Learningcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

5 papers.