mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Multi-Armed Bandits for Intelligent Tutoring Systems

arXiv 1310.3174 ↗First posted 11 Oct 2013cs.AIcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present an approach to Intelligent Tutoring Systems which adaptively personalizes sequences of learning activities to maximize skills acquired by students, taking into account the limited time and motivational resources. At a given point in time, the system proposes to the students the activity which makes them progress faster. We introduce two algorithms that rely on the empirical estimation of the learning progress, RiARiT that uses information about the difficulty of each exercise and ZPDES that uses much less knowledge about the problem. The system is based on the combination of three approaches. First, it leverages recent models of intrinsically motivated learning by transposing them to active teaching, relying on empirical estimation of learning progress provided by specific activities to particular students. Second, it uses state-of-the-art Multi-Arm Bandit (MAB) techniques to efficiently manage the exploration/exploitation challenge of this optimization process. Third, it leverages expert knowledge to constrain and bootstrap initial exploration of the MAB, while requiring only coarse guidance information of the expert and allowing the system to deal with didactic gaps in its knowledge. The system is evaluated in a scenario where 7-8 year old schoolchildren learn how to decompose numbers while manipulating money. Systematic experiments are presented with simulated students, followed by results of a user study across a population of 400 school children.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2013.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 6; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Peeking with PEAK: Sequential, Nonparametric Composite Hypothesis Tests for Means of Multiple Data Streamscited by 9
  2. 2025MAGELLAN: Metacognitive predictions of learning progress guide autotelic LLM agents in large goal spacescited by 7
  3. 2021Challenges in Statistical Analysis of Data Collected by a Bandit Algorithm: An Empirical Exploration in Applications to Adaptively Randomized Experimentscited by 6
  4. 2024p-Mean Regret for Stochastic Banditscited by 6
  5. 2021Improving Artificial Teachers by Considering How People Learn and Forgetcited by 4
  6. 2021Dealing with Expert Bias in Collective Decision-Makingcited by 4
  7. 2025Shared Autonomy for Proximal Teachingcited by 4
  8. 2023Towards Scalable Adaptive Learning with Graph Neural Networks and Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  9. 2025DP-NCB: Privacy Preserving Fair Banditscited by 2
  10. 2022Reinforcement Teachingcited by 1
  11. 2022Raising Student Completion Rates with Adaptive Curriculum and Contextual Banditscited by 1
  12. 2023Getting too personal(ized): The importance of feature choice in online adaptive algorithmscited by 1
9 more
  1. 2024Hierarchical Multi-Armed Bandits for the Concurrent Intelligent Tutoring of Concepts and Problems of Varying Difficulty Levelscited by 1
  2. 2026CANINE: Coaching Visually Impaired Users for Interactive Navigation with a Robot Guide Dogcited by 1
  3. 2024Improved Performances and Motivation in Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Combining Machine Learning and Learner Choicecited by 0
  4. 2024Prerequisite Structure Discovery in Intelligent Tutoring Systemscited by 0
  5. 2024A Pre-Trained Graph-Based Model for Adaptive Sequencing of Educational Documentscited by 0
  6. 2025A Computational Model of Inclusive Pedagogy: From Understanding to Applicationcited by 0
  7. 2026Learning to Allocate Resources with Censored Feedbackcited by 0
  8. 2026Counterfactual learning of new adaptive instructional policies using logged datacited by 0
  9. 2026Stochasticity Is Not the Hard Part: Reduction and Complexity in Instructional Sequencing over Prerequisite DAGscited by 0