mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Assessing the calibration of high-dimensional ensemble forecasts using rank histograms

arXiv 1310.0236 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2013stat.MEcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Any decision making process that relies on a probabilistic forecast of future events necessarily requires a calibrated forecast. This paper proposes new methods for empirically assessing forecast calibration in a multivariate setting where the probabilistic forecast is given by an ensemble of equally probable forecast scenarios. Multivariate properties are mapped to a single dimension through a pre-rank function and the calibration is subsequently assessed visually through a histogram of the ranks of the observation's pre-ranks. Average ranking assigns a pre-rank based on the average univariate rank while band depth ranking employs the concept of functional band depth where the centrality of the observation within the forecast ensemble is assessed. Several simulation examples and a case study of temperature forecast trajectories at Berlin Tegel Airport in Germany demonstrate that both multivariate ranking methods can successfully detect various sources of miscalibration and scale efficiently to high dimensional settings.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2013.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

6 papers.