Enhancing multivariate post-processed visibility predictions utilizing CAMS forecasts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In our contemporary era, meteorological weather forecasts increasingly incorporate ensemble predictions of visibility - a parameter of great importance in aviation, maritime navigation, and air quality assessment, with direct implications for public health. However, this weather variable falls short of the predictive accuracy achieved for other quantities issued by meteorological centers. Therefore, statistical post-processing is recommended to enhance the reliability and accuracy of predictions. By estimating the predictive distributions of the variables with the aid of historical observations and forecasts, one can achieve statistical consistency between true observations and ensemble predictions. Visibility observations, following the recommendation of the World Meteorological Organization, are typically reported in discrete values; hence, the predictive distribution of the weather quantity takes the form of a discrete parametric law. Recent studies demonstrated that the application of classification algorithms can successfully improve the skill of such discrete forecasts; however, a frequently emerging issue is that certain spatial and/or temporal dependencies could be lost between marginals. Based on visibility ensemble forecasts of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts for 30 locations in Central Europe, we investigate whether the inclusion of Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) predictions of the same weather quantity as an additional covariate could enhance the skill of the post-processing methods and whether it contributes to the successful integration of spatial dependence between marginals. Our study confirms that post-processed forecasts are substantially superior to raw and climatological predictions, and the utilization of CAMS forecasts provides a further significant enhancement both in the univariate and multivariate setup.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2024.
Builds on
11 of 54 references.
References · 11
- 2018Neural networks for post-processing ensemble weather forecastscited by 95
- 2021Machine learning methods for postprocessing ensemble forecasts of wind gusts: A systematic comparisoncited by 34
- 2022Generative machine learning methods for multivariate ensemble post-processingcited by 26
- 2013Uncertainty Quantification in Complex Simulation Models Using Ensemble Copula Couplingcited by 21
- 2013Assessing the calibration of high-dimensional ensemble forecasts using rank histogramscited by 6
- 2022Score-based calibration testing for multivariate forecast distributionscited by 6
- 2023Assessing the calibration of multivariate probabilistic forecastscited by 5
- 2020Machine learning for total cloud cover predictioncited by 4
- 2014Joint probabilistic forecasting of wind speed and temperature using Bayesian model averagingcited by 3
- 2023Parametric model for post-processing visibility ensemble forecastscited by 2
- 2023Statistical post-processing of visibility ensemble forecastscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.