A Composite-Loss Graph Neural Network for the Multivariate Post-Processing of Ensemble Weather Forecasts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Ensemble forecasting systems have advanced meteorology by providing probabilistic estimates of future states. Nonetheless, systematic biases often persist, making statistical post-processing essential. Traditional parametric post-processing techniques and machine learning-based methods can produce calibrated predictive distributions at specific locations and lead times, yet often struggle to capture dependencies across forecast dimensions. To address this, multivariate post-processing methods-such as ensemble copula coupling and the Schaake shuffle-are widely applied in a second step to restore realistic inter-variable or spatio-temporal dependencies. The aim of this study is the multivariate post-processing of ensemble forecasts using a graph neural network (dualGNN) trained with a composite loss function that combines the energy score (ES) and the variogram score (VS). The method is evaluated on two datasets: WRF-based solar irradiance forecasts over northern Chile and ECMWF visibility forecasts for Central Europe. The dualGNN consistently outperforms all empirical copula-based post-processed forecasts and shows significant improvements compared to graph neural networks trained solely on either the continuous ranked probability score or the ES, according to the evaluated multivariate verification metrics. Furthermore, for the WRF forecasts, the rank-order structure of the dualGNN forecasts captures valuable dependency information, enabling a more effective restoration of spatial relationships than either the raw numerical weather prediction ensemble or historical observational rank structures. Notably, incorporating VS into the loss function improved the univariate performance for both target variables compared to training on ES alone. Moreover, for the visibility forecasts, the ES-VS combination even outperformed the strongest calibrated reference in terms of univariate performance.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2025.
Builds on
16 of 41 references.
References · 16
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
- 2021Graph Neural Network for Traffic Forecasting: A Surveycited by 261
- 2018Neural networks for post-processing ensemble weather forecastscited by 95
- 2022Generative machine learning methods for multivariate ensemble post-processingcited by 26
- 2013Uncertainty Quantification in Complex Simulation Models Using Ensemble Copula Couplingcited by 22
- 2013Assessing the calibration of high-dimensional ensemble forecasts using rank histogramscited by 6
- 2022Score-based calibration testing for multivariate forecast distributionscited by 6
- 2023Assessing the calibration of multivariate probabilistic forecastscited by 5
- 2022A two-step machine learning approach to statistical post-processing of weather forecasts for power generationcited by 4
- 2024Graph Neural Networks and Spatial Information Learning for Post-Processing Ensemble Weather Forecastscited by 4
- 2024Clustering-based spatial interpolation of parametric post-processing modelscited by 3
4 more
- 2024Enhancing multivariate post-processed visibility predictions utilizing CAMS forecastscited by 2
- 2024Distributional Regression U-Nets for the Postprocessing of Precipitation Ensemble Forecastscited by 2
- 2025Graph Neural Networks for Enhancing Ensemble Forecasts of Extreme Rainfallcited by 2
- 2024Machine learning-based probabilistic forecasting of solar irradiance in Chilecited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026On the sensitivity of machine-learned probabilistic weather forecast models to scale-aware scoring rulescited by 1
- 2026STIPP: Space-time in situ postprocessing over the French Alps using proper scoring rulescited by 0
- 2026Statistical versus machine learning-based spatial interpolation of post-processed ensemble weather forecastscited by 0
- 2026Statistical versus machine learning-based spatial interpolation of post-processed ensemble weather forecasts7 Sep 2026
- 2026On the sensitivity of machine-learned probabilistic weather forecast models to scale-aware scoring rules21 Jul 2026
- 2026STIPP: Space-time in situ postprocessing over the French Alps using proper scoring rules6 Jan 2026