mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

VE-Bench: Subjective-Aligned Benchmark Suite for Text-Driven Video Editing Quality Assessment

arXiv 2408.11481 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2024cs.CVcited by 10

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Diffusion and multimodal model alignment

Abstract (arXiv)

Text-driven video editing has recently experienced rapid development. Despite this, evaluating edited videos remains a considerable challenge. Current metrics tend to fail to align with human perceptions, and effective quantitative metrics for video editing are still notably absent. To address this, we introduce VE-Bench, a benchmark suite tailored to the assessment of text-driven video editing. This suite includes VE-Bench DB, a video quality assessment (VQA) database for video editing. VE-Bench DB encompasses a diverse set of source videos featuring various motions and subjects, along with multiple distinct editing prompts, editing results from 8 different models, and the corresponding Mean Opinion Scores (MOS) from 24 human annotators. Based on VE-Bench DB, we further propose VE-Bench QA, a quantitative human-aligned measurement for the text-driven video editing task. In addition to the aesthetic, distortion, and other visual quality indicators that traditional VQA methods emphasize, VE-Bench QA focuses on the text-video alignment and the relevance modeling between source and edited videos. It proposes a new assessment network for video editing that attains superior performance in alignment with human preferences. To the best of our knowledge, VE-Bench introduces the first quality assessment dataset for video editing and an effective subjective-aligned quantitative metric for this domain. All data and code will be publicly available at https://github.com/littlespray/VE-Bench.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Diffusion and multimodal model alignment, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 31 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2024.

Builds on

31 of 42 references.

References · 31

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
  3. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,029
  4. 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,764
  5. 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,310
  6. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,894
  7. 2018Towards Accurate Generative Models of Video: A New Metric & Challengescited by 1,204
  8. 2017The 2017 DAVIS Challenge on Video Object Segmentationcited by 942
  9. 2023Text2Video-Zero: Text-to-Image Diffusion Models are Zero-Shot Video Generatorscited by 666
  10. 2023FateZero: Fusing Attentions for Zero-shot Text-based Video Editingcited by 462
  11. 2023TokenFlow: Consistent Diffusion Features for Consistent Video Editingcited by 440
  12. 2023ControlVideo: Training-free Controllable Text-to-Video Generationcited by 324
19 more
  1. 2023Pix2Video: Video Editing using Image Diffusioncited by 318
  2. 2022Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectivescited by 314
  3. 2023Video-P2P: Video Editing with Cross-attention Controlcited by 312
  4. 2023Rerender A Video: Zero-Shot Text-Guided Video-to-Video Translationcited by 253
  5. 2024Diffusion Model-Based Image Editing: A Surveycited by 212
  6. 2022UniFormer: Unifying Convolution and Self-attention for Visual Recognitioncited by 206
  7. 2023StableVideo: Text-driven Consistency-aware Diffusion Video Editingcited by 182
  8. 2022FAST-VQA: Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessment with Fragment Samplingcited by 179
  9. 2023Spring: A High-Resolution High-Detail Dataset and Benchmark for Scene Flow, Optical Flow and Stereocited by 170
  10. 2020Patch-VQ: 'Patching Up' the Video Quality Problemcited by 147
  11. 2022A Deep Learning based No-reference Quality Assessment Model for UGC Videoscited by 128
  12. 2018Large-Scale Study of Perceptual Video Qualitycited by 127
  13. 2023RAVE: Randomized Noise Shuffling for Fast and Consistent Video Editing with Diffusion Modelscited by 113
  14. 2022Masked Video Distillation: Rethinking Masked Feature Modeling for Self-supervised Video Representation Learningcited by 90
  15. 2023CCEdit: Creative and Controllable Video Editing via Diffusion Modelscited by 80
  16. 2023CVPR 2023 Text Guided Video Editing Competitioncited by 54
  17. 2024FRESCO: Spatial-Temporal Correspondence for Zero-Shot Video Translationcited by 48
  18. 2013Learning to Rank for Blind Image Quality Assessmentcited by 25
  19. 2024Exploring AIGC Video Quality: A Focus on Visual Harmony, Video-Text Consistency and Domain Distribution Gapcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 8; 2026: 1.

10 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026VEFX-Bench: A Holistic Benchmark for Generic Video Editing and Visual Effects
  2. 2024EditBoard: Towards a Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Text-Based Video Editing Models
  3. 2026OmniEdit-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Instruction-based Video Editing
  4. 2026VEBench:Benchmarking Large Multimodal Models for Real-World Video Editing
  5. 2025FiVE: A Fine-grained Video Editing Benchmark for Evaluating Emerging Diffusion and Rectified Flow Models
  6. 2026VideoArgus: Agentic Rubric-Grounded Unified Evaluation for Video Generation and Editing
  7. 2025SST-EM: Advanced Metrics for Evaluating Semantic, Spatial and Temporal Aspects in Video Editing
  8. 2026MIEScore: Human-Aligned Evaluation for Multi-Source Image Editing