mlsanityData to 19 Oct 2026

VocalGrad: Evaluating Acoustic Perception in Audio Language Models

arXiv 2610.23745 ↗First posted 16 Oct 2026cs.SD cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: Speech and audio language models → Audio language models and spoken dialogue

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent large audio language models (LALMs) have extended their capabilities beyond lexical speech understanding to tasks requiring paralinguistic and non-linguistic audio understanding, such as emotion recognition. However, these models still struggle to reliably utilize acoustic information, particularly when it co-occurs with spoken linguistic content. Existing benchmarks do not clearly distinguish acoustic perception from higher-level reasoning, making it difficult to identify the source of these failures. To address this issue, we introduce VocalGrad, a benchmark designed to evaluate LALMs' ability to perceive low-level acoustic variations. VocalGrad formulates this problem as a simple binary classification of temporal change direction, enabling evaluation largely independent of higher-level reasoning or semantic understanding. Our benchmark results reveal a substantial gap in acoustic perception between human annotators and state-of-the-art LALMs: while human annotators achieve high accuracy, LALMs perform at near-chance levels. We further conduct linear probing to identify structural bottlenecks in these models. Our analysis reveals two distinct failure modes: for some categories, task-relevant information is preserved in internal representations but not utilized by the language model head; for others, the information becomes progressively less linearly decodable across model layers. Overall, our results reveal substantial limitations of LALMs in modeling acoustic variation under controlled settings and expose representation differences not observable from text outputs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 19 Oct 2026). Placed in Audio language models and spoken dialogue, one of 11 directions in Speech and audio language models. Builds on 29 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Oct 2026.

Builds on

29 of 44 references.

Closest ancestors · 10

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025MiMo-Audio: Audio Language Models are Few-Shot Learners29 Dec
  2. 2025When Silence Matters: The Impact of Irrelevant Audio on Text Reasoning in Large Audio-Language Models1 Oct
  3. 2025Can Large Audio Language Models Understand Audio Well? Speech, Scene and Events Understanding Benchmark for LALMs16 Sep
  4. 2025WoW-Bench: Evaluating Fine-Grained Acoustic Perception in Audio-Language Models via Marine Mammal Vocalizations28 Aug
  5. 2025Step-Audio 2 Technical Report22 Jul
  6. 2025Audio Flamingo 3: Advancing Audio Intelligence with Fully Open Large Audio Language Models10 Jul
  7. 2025AudioLens: A Closer Look at Auditory Attribute Perception of Large Audio-Language Models5 Jun
  8. 2025MMSU: A Massive Multi-task Spoken Language Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark5 Jun
  9. 2025MMAR: A Challenging Benchmark for Deep Reasoning in Speech, Audio, Music, and Their Mix19 May
  10. 2024Salmon: A Suite for Acoustic Language Model Evaluation11 Sep

Other references · 19

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,465
  2. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,769
  3. 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 4,385
  4. 2025Gemini 2.5: Pushing the Frontier with Advanced Reasoning, Multimodality, Long Context, and Next Generation Agentic Capabilitiescited by 3,936
  5. 2021HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Unitscited by 2,762
  6. 2019Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpuscited by 1,596
  7. 2018MELD: A Multimodal Multi-Party Dataset for Emotion Recognition in Conversationscited by 680
  8. 2025Kimi-Audio Technical Reportcited by 280
  9. 2024Self-Supervised Speech Representations are More Phonetic than Semanticcited by 79
  10. 2021VoiceFixer: Toward General Speech Restoration with Neural Vocodercited by 57
  11. 2023Probing self-supervised speech models for phonetic and phonemic information: a case study in aspirationcited by 37
  12. 2025Do Audio LLMs Really LISTEN, or Just Transcribe? Measuring Lexical vs. Acoustic Emotion Cues Reliancecited by 34
7 more
  1. 2024Encoding of lexical tone in self-supervised models of spoken languagecited by 24
  2. 2025Beyond Transcription: Mechanistic Interpretability in ASRcited by 18
  3. 2025Loquacious Set: 25,000 Hours of Transcribed and Diverse English Speech Recognition Data for Research and Commercial Usecited by 14
  4. 2025A Large-Scale Probing Analysis of Speaker-Specific Attributes in Self-Supervised Speech Representationscited by 11
  5. 2025StressTest: Can YOUR Speech LM Handle the Stress?cited by 10
  6. 2026The Illusion of Stochasticity in LLMscited by 10
  7. 2025Transcribe, Translate, or Transliterate: An Investigation of Intermediate Representations in Spoken Language Modelscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MRMAD: A Multi-Round Multi-Audio Benchmark for Evaluating Acoustic Degradation Perception in Large Audio-Language Models
  2. 2025HPSU: A Benchmark for Human-Level Perception in Real-World Spoken Speech Understanding
  3. 2026A Closer Look at Failure Modes in Temporal Understanding of Large Audio-Language Models
  4. 2025Towards Holistic Evaluation of Large Audio-Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
  5. 2025SpeechR: A Benchmark for Speech Reasoning in Large Audio-Language Models
  6. 2026Do Audio LLMs Listen or Read? Analyzing and Mitigating Paralinguistic Failures with VoxParadox
  7. 2026Where Does the Sound Go? Tracing Acoustic Information Loss in Audio-Conditioned LLMs
  8. 2025Lost in Phonation: Voice Quality Variation as an Evaluation Dimension for Speech Foundation Models