DeSpatial: The devil of Agentic Spatial Reasoning Lies in 3D Itself
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)
Spatial agents have access to reconstruction and segmentation tools, yet inconsistent predictions and fragmented object identities can prevent their outputs from becoming reliable 3D scene information. A simple oracle experiment exposes this perception bottleneck: replacing tool-predicted perception with ground-truth 3D bounding boxes raises an agent to nearly full score across five object-centric VSI-Bench tasks, while retaining the same reasoning tools. Motivated by this finding, we believe the devil of spatial reasoning lies in 3D itself, and introduce DeSpatial(Devil of Spatial), which explicitly decomposes spatial understanding into perception and reasoning. DeSpatial has a shared 3D perception tool to reconcile independent perception outputs into a unified, metric, gravity-aligned 3D scene. This perception tool has two core components: a) a joint segmentation--depth co-refinement module that consolidates masks of the same object and removes projection artifacts caused by inconsistent segmentation and depth within a single frame; b) a cross-view instance fusion module that consolidate voxel-overlapping instances but not allowed to merge same-frame instances. This fusion module additionally fuses spatially disjoint fragments caused by insufficient multi-view observations, by checking their 3D structure and source mask appearance. After receiving the complete and unified 3D scene information, the agent chooses reasoning or computational tools to solve the spatial problem. DeSpatial achieves leading performance on VSI-Bench, MindCube-Tiny, and ViewSpatial, with additional long-video results on VSI-SUPER, revealing the bottleneck of spatial understanding lies in a precise 3D perception itself.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 14 Oct 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Disentangling 3D Modeling from Spatial Reasoning
- 20263ViewSense: Spatial and Mental Perspective Reasoning from Orthographic Views in Vision-Language Models
- 2026SpaceCast-Bench: Evaluating Predictive Spatial Reasoning in Vision-Language Models
- 2026From Reasoning Failures to Composable Video Spatial Intelligence
- 2026S-Agent: Spatial Tool-Use Elicits Reasoning for Spatial Intelligence
- 2025Pursuing Minimal Sufficiency in Spatial Reasoning
- 2025Beyond Flatlands: Unlocking Spatial Intelligence by Decoupling 3D Reasoning from Numerical Regression
- 2025Reasoning Path and Latent State Analysis for Multi-view Visual Spatial Reasoning: A Cognitive Science Perspective