mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Unlocking Token Rewards via Training-Free Reward Attribution

arXiv 2610.18704 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward hacking and misspecification also fits: Process reward models for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we propose an extremely efficient, training-free method to extract token-level reward signals directly from an existing deep reward model. Our core idea is to attribute the overall process reward to individual tokens by estimating each token's influence. This influence is defined as the change in the final macroscopic reward (e.g., the process reward) when a token is replaced with a semantically null token. Naively calculating this influence is computationally infeasible, requiring N forward passes through the PRM for an N-token sequence. We overcome this bottleneck by proposing a highly efficient gradient-based estimator. Specifically, we use a first-order Taylor approximation, which simplifies the influence calculation to the inner product of the difference between the token embedding and the null token embedding, and the gradient of the reward with respect to the token embedding. This requires only a single forward and backward pass. The resulting token-level rewards enable standard RL algorithms to perform precise credit assignment without requiring additional reward model training. Experiments on challenging reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that our method substantially improves policy optimization efficiency and enhances the generalization of LLM reasoning capabilities. Our P2T outperforms the outcome reward by +4.9% on MathVista for Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct, and +11.5% on AIME24 for Qwen2.5-Math-7B. The code will be released via https://github.com/stonewst/P2T.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward hacking and misspecification, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 45 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.

Builds on

45 of 56 references.

References · 45

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  4. 2025Qwen3 Technical Reportcited by 8,820
  5. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  6. 2025Qwen2.5-VL Technical Reportcited by 5,587
  7. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  8. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,942
  9. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scalecited by 2,810
  10. 2023MMMU: A Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding and Reasoning Benchmark for Expert AGIcited by 2,080
  11. 2023MathVista: Evaluating Mathematical Reasoning of Foundation Models in Visual Contextscited by 1,614
  12. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,462
33 more
  1. 2022Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Modelscited by 1,392
  2. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,203
  3. 2024OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problemscited by 1,136
  4. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,090
  5. 2024Are We on the Right Way for Evaluating Large Vision-Language Models?cited by 914
  6. 2022Solving math word problems with process- and outcome-based feedbackcited by 901
  7. 2025Vision-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in Multimodal Large Language Modelscited by 665
  8. 2024MathVerse: Does Your Multi-modal LLM Truly See the Diagrams in Visual Math Problems?cited by 586
  9. 2024Measuring Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with MATH-Vision Datasetcited by 526
  10. 2025Process Reinforcement through Implicit Rewardscited by 504
  11. 2025Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base Modelcited by 461
  12. 2024Improve Mathematical Reasoning in Language Models by Automated Process Supervisioncited by 441
  13. 2025The Lessons of Developing Process Reward Models in Mathematical Reasoningcited by 415
  14. 2024Rewarding Progress: Scaling Automated Process Verifiers for LLM Reasoningcited by 279
  15. 2025LMM-R1: Empowering 3B LMMs with Strong Reasoning Abilities Through Two-Stage Rule-Based RLcited by 248
  16. 2025Inference-Time Scaling for Generalist Reward Modelingcited by 239
  17. 2025The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoningcited by 166
  18. 2025VisualPRM: An Effective Process Reward Model for Multimodal Reasoningcited by 139
  19. 2025CodeElo: Benchmarking Competition-level Code Generation of LLMs with Human-comparable Elo Ratingscited by 115
  20. 2023Let's reward step by step: Step-Level reward model as the Navigators for Reasoningcited by 102
  21. 2024Process Reward Model with Q-Value Rankingscited by 80
  22. 2025Unlocking Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning via Process Reward Modelcited by 65
  23. 2025Exploring the Limit of Outcome Reward for Learning Mathematical Reasoningcited by 52
  24. 2025ReasonFlux-PRM: Trajectory-Aware PRMs for Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in LLMscited by 46
  25. 2025VersaPRM: Multi-Domain Process Reward Model via Synthetic Reasoning Datacited by 40
  26. 2024Diving into Self-Evolving Training for Multimodal Reasoningcited by 32
  27. 2025MM-PRM: Enhancing Multimodal Mathematical Reasoning with Scalable Step-Level Supervisioncited by 31
  28. 2025AdaptiveStep: Automatically Dividing Reasoning Step through Model Confidencecited by 24
  29. 2025SCAR: Shapley Credit Assignment for More Efficient RLHFcited by 16
  30. 2025GM-PRM: A Generative Multimodal Process Reward Model for Multimodal Mathematical Reasoningcited by 14
  31. 2025Self-Guided Process Reward Optimization with Redefined Step-wise Advantage for Process Reinforcement Learningcited by 11
  32. 2024Token-Supervised Value Models for Enhancing Mathematical Problem-Solving Capabilities of Large Language Modelscited by 8
  33. 2025Token-Efficient RL for LLM Reasoningcited by 7

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026DelTA: Discriminative Token Credit Assignment for Reinforcement Learning from Verifiable Rewards
  2. 2025Discriminative Policy Optimization for Token-Level Reward Models
  3. 2025Stop Summation: Min-Form Credit Assignment Is All Process Reward Model Needs for Reasoning
  4. 2026Scaling Reward Modeling without Human Supervision
  5. 2025Token Hidden Reward: Steering Exploration-Exploitation in Group Relative Deep Reinforcement Learning
  6. 2026Reward Models Are Secretly Value Functions: Temporally Coherent Reward Modeling
  7. 2024Adaptive Segment-level Reward: Bridging the Gap Between Action and Reward Space in Alignment
  8. 2026The Cancellation Hypothesis in Critic-Free RL: From Outcome Rewards to Token Credits