Graph-free Retrieval with Graph-Modified Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Dense vector retrieval can miss evidence connected through intermediate entities, while direct graph retrieval requires access to the graph at query time. We compare five offline graph-based embedding transformations and strategies for using the resulting graph-modified embeddings alongside the originals, without query-time graph access. On a synthetic professional-network benchmark with complete supporting-evidence sets, direct replacement of the original embeddings reduces evidence recovery. Multi-stage strategies improve recovery by using graph-modified embeddings to guide the search while retaining the originals for semantic relevance. On questions requiring linked facts or comparisons among candidates, the strongest configuration improves recovery by up to 25.9% relative to plain vector retrieval. It also matches baseline recovery with 40% fewer returned nodes. Controls confirm that graph information contributes beyond multi-stage retrieval alone. Across the tested methods, retrieval performance depends more on how graph-modified embeddings are used than on how they are produced.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.
Builds on
23 of 32 references.
References · 23
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
- 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,754
- 2016node2vec: Scalable Feature Learning for Networkscited by 1,918
- 2014DeepWalk: Online Learning of Social Representationscited by 1,547
- 2019Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,477
- 2024From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarizationcited by 1,453
- 2022Interleaving Retrieval with Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Knowledge-Intensive Multi-Step Questionscited by 923
- 2021MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Compositioncited by 916
- 2023Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models with Iterative Retrieval-Generation Synergycited by 346
- 2024HippoRAG: Neurobiologically Inspired Long-Term Memory for Large Language Modelscited by 281
- 2019PullNet: Open Domain Question Answering with Iterative Retrieval on Knowledge Bases and Textcited by 184
11 more
- 2018Open Domain Question Answering Using Early Fusion of Knowledge Bases and Textcited by 168
- 2020Answering Complex Open-Domain Questions with Multi-Hop Dense Retrievalcited by 162
- 2016Counter-fitting Word Vectors to Linguistic Constraintscited by 140
- 2022SimKGC: Simple Contrastive Knowledge Graph Completion with Pre-trained Language Modelscited by 91
- 2021Improving Query Representations for Dense Retrieval with Pseudo Relevance Feedbackcited by 47
- 2021Pseudo-Relevance Feedback for Multiple Representation Dense Retrievalcited by 32
- 2018NPRF: A Neural Pseudo Relevance Feedback Framework for Ad-hoc Information Retrievalcited by 17
- 2022Retrofitting Multilingual Sentence Embeddings with Abstract Meaning Representationcited by 5
- 2025Ground-Truth Subgraphs for Better Training and Evaluation of Knowledge Graph Augmented LLMscited by 3
- 2017Retrofitting Distributional Embeddings to Knowledge Graphs with Functional Relationscited by 2
- 2023Semantic Specialization for Knowledge-based Word Sense Disambiguationcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.