mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Improving Neural Symbolic Regression with a Diverse Prior and Post-training Alignment

arXiv 2610.17994 ↗First posted 13 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Symbolic regression is the problem of finding an expression that fits a dataset. Solving it requires searching a combinatorial space of candidate expressions. Neural symbolic regression can amortize that search by training a model once on synthetic data and then predicting expressions for a new dataset. But existing models still underperform genetic programming on real, noisy data. We argue that the deficit lies in the training rather than in the paradigm, and present RASR (Reinforced Amortized Symbolic Regression), a method with two key changes to the training recipe. First, we design a synthetic prior that narrows the gap with real-world data: inputs come from the prior of a tabular foundation model; constants are sampled bottom-up, conditioned on the data; targets carry heteroscedastic and structured noise; and everything is standardized. Second, we split training into two stages. Supervised pre-training maximizes the token-level likelihood of a reference expression. This is followed by reinforcement-learning post-training that aligns the model with its inference-time use by rewarding held-out fit and penalizing expression size. On the black-box track of SRBench 2.0, RASR achieves the best mean test R2 rank of all evaluated methods. Three RASR variants, trained with different size penalties, make up most of the accuracy-complexity Pareto front. On Strogatz, our method recovers more ground-truth expressions than any baseline, and on Feynman it is competitive with the best-performing methods.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.

Builds on

29 of 46 references.

References · 29

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
  3. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 5,045
  4. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,703
  5. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,480
  6. 2017Sigmoid-Weighted Linear Units for Neural Network Function Approximation in Reinforcement Learningcited by 950
  7. 2022TabPFN: A Transformer That Solves Small Tabular Classification Problems in a Secondcited by 674
  8. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 309
  9. 2025Gated Attention for Large Language Models: Non-linearity, Sparsity, and Attention-Sink-Freecited by 283
  10. 2020Query-Key Normalization for Transformerscited by 280
  11. 2016Using the Output Embedding to Improve Language Modelscited by 272
  12. 2019Deep Learning for Symbolic Mathematicscited by 270
17 more
  1. 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 215
  2. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 203
  3. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 192
  4. 2025TabArena: A Living Benchmark for Machine Learning on Tabular Datacited by 176
  5. 2018Learning Equations for Extrapolation and Controlcited by 156
  6. 2026TabICLv2: A better, faster, scalable, and open tabular foundation modelcited by 144
  7. 2017PMLB: A Large Benchmark Suite for Machine Learning Evaluation and Comparisoncited by 140
  8. 2023Transformer-based Planning for Symbolic Regressioncited by 79
  9. 2022Symbolic Regression is NP-hardcited by 71
  10. 2022SymFormer: End-to-end symbolic regression using transformer-based architecturecited by 59
  11. 2023SNIP: Bridging Mathematical Symbolic and Numeric Realms with Unified Pre-trainingcited by 47
  12. 2025Scalable-Softmax Is Superior for Attentioncited by 45
  13. 2025Call for Action: towards the next generation of symbolic regression benchmarkcited by 17
  14. 2025Risk-Sensitive RL for Alleviating Exploration Dilemmas in Large Language Modelscited by 14
  15. 2024Multi-View Symbolic Regressioncited by 4
  16. 2025Towards Scaling Laws for Symbolic Regressioncited by 2
  17. 2026Breaking the Simplification Bottleneck in Amortized Neural Symbolic Regressioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.