mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Breaking the Simplification Bottleneck in Amortized Neural Symbolic Regression

arXiv 2602.08885 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.SCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Symbolic regression (SR) aims to discover interpretable analytical expressions that accurately describe observed data. Amortized SR promises to be much more efficient than the predominant genetic programming SR methods, but currently struggles to scale to realistic scientific complexity. We find that a key obstacle is the lack of a fast reduction of equivalent expressions to a concise normalized form. Amortized SR has addressed this with general-purpose Computer Algebra Systems (CAS) like SymPy, but the high computational cost severely limits training and inference speed. We propose SimpliPy, a rule-based simplification engine achieving a 100-fold speed-up over SymPy at comparable quality. This enables substantial improvements in amortized SR, including scalability to much larger training sets, more efficient use of the per-expression token budget, and systematic training set decontamination with respect to equivalent test expressions. We demonstrate these advantages in our Flash-ANSR framework, which achieves much better accuracy than amortized baselines (NeSymReS, E2E) on the FastSRB benchmark. Moreover, it performs on par with state-of-the-art direct optimization (PySR) while recovering more concise rather than more complex expressions with increasing inference budget.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2026.

Builds on

27 of 54 references.

References · 27

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  3. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  4. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
  5. 2023FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work Partitioningcited by 2,551
  6. 2019Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformerscited by 1,523
  7. 2019Root Mean Square Layer Normalizationcited by 1,425
  8. 2018Reconciling modern machine learning practice and the bias-variance trade-offcited by 919
  9. 2020On Layer Normalization in the Transformer Architecturecited by 906
  10. 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
  11. 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 705
  12. 2024MiniCPM: Unveiling the Potential of Small Language Models with Scalable Training Strategiescited by 694
15 more
  1. 2019Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurtcited by 667
  2. 2019AI Feynman: a Physics-Inspired Method for Symbolic Regressioncited by 536
  3. 2019The frontier of simulation-based inferencecited by 490
  4. 2019Deep symbolic regression: Recovering mathematical expressions from data via risk-seeking policy gradientscited by 294
  5. 2019Deep Learning for Symbolic Mathematicscited by 266
  6. 2021Contemporary Symbolic Regression Methods and their Relative Performancecited by 209
  7. 2022End-to-end symbolic regression with transformerscited by 195
  8. 2021Neural Symbolic Regression that Scalescited by 185
  9. 2024Scaling Laws and Compute-Optimal Training Beyond Fixed Training Durationscited by 160
  10. 2021SymbolicGPT: A Generative Transformer Model for Symbolic Regressioncited by 101
  11. 2023ODEFormer: Symbolic Regression of Dynamical Systems with Transformerscited by 58
  12. 2022SymFormer: End-to-end symbolic regression using transformer-based architecturecited by 56
  13. 2022Set Norm and Equivariant Skip Connections: Putting the Deep in Deep Setscited by 17
  14. 2024Symbolic regression via MDLformer-guided search: from minimizing prediction error to minimizing description lengthcited by 16
  15. 2024MMSR: Symbolic Regression is a Multi-Modal Information Fusion Taskcited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.