mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AutoMARS: Automatic and Scalable Multi-Agent Large Language Model Framework for Supply Chain Risk Assessment

arXiv 2610.17206 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose AutoMARS (Automatic Multi-Agent Risk Assessment), an agentic framework for automatic and scalable comparative risk assessment in supply chain networks. The framework enables end-to-end execution of analytical workflows by automatically planning tasks, coordinating specialized agents, invoking external analytical tools, and synthesizing domain-specific results into integrated risk evaluations. AutoMARS further supports scalable risk comparison across multiple locations by parallelizing independent analytical tasks. The framework adopts a multi-domain, multi-agent, and multi-tool architecture that integrates heterogeneous risk factors from socioeconomic, disaster, environmental, and transportation domains. Through coordinated agent interactions and tool integration, AutoMARS enables structured, systematic, and interpretable comparative analysis to support supply chain risk-aware location evaluation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 26 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

Builds on

26 of 56 references.

References · 26

  1. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  2. 2022Constitutional AI: Harmlessness from AI Feedbackcited by 3,050
  3. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
  4. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,395
  5. 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
  6. 2024Large Language Model based Multi-Agents: A Survey of Progress and Challengescited by 769
  7. 2024From Generation to Judgment: Opportunities and Challenges of LLM-as-a-judgecited by 494
  8. 2024LLMs-as-Judges: A Comprehensive Survey on LLM-based Evaluation Methodscited by 465
  9. 2021Dynabench: Rethinking Benchmarking in NLPcited by 459
  10. 2025Multi-Agent Collaboration Mechanisms: A Survey of LLMscited by 431
  11. 2022Self-critiquing models for assisting human evaluatorscited by 380
  12. 2024LLMs instead of Human Judges? A Large Scale Empirical Study across 20 NLP Evaluation Taskscited by 243
14 more
  1. 2024Judging the Judges: Evaluating Alignment and Vulnerabilities in LLMs-as-Judgescited by 205
  2. 2024Limitations of the LLM-as-a-Judge Approach for Evaluating LLM Outputs in Expert Knowledge Taskscited by 106
  3. 2023Wider and Deeper LLM Networks are Fairer LLM Evaluatorscited by 94
  4. 2023Automatic Evaluation of Attribution by Large Language Modelscited by 72
  5. 2025Multi-Agent-as-Judge: Aligning LLM-Agent-Based Automated Evaluation with Multi-Dimensional Human Evaluationcited by 30
  6. 2024EconLogicQA: A Question-Answering Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Models in Economic Sequential Reasoningcited by 22
  7. 2024InvAgent: A Large Language Model based Multi-Agent System for Inventory Management in Supply Chainscited by 22
  8. 2024TPP-LLM: Modeling Temporal Point Processes by Efficiently Fine-Tuning Large Language Modelscited by 9
  9. 2025EconWebArena: Benchmarking Autonomous Agents on Economic Tasks in Realistic Web Environmentscited by 9
  10. 2024Retrieval of Temporal Event Sequences from Textual Descriptionscited by 6
  11. 2025CRMAgent: A Multi-Agent LLM System for E-Commerce CRM Message Template Generationcited by 6
  12. 2025Leveraging Large Language Models for Risk Assessment in Hyperconnected Logistic Hub Network Deploymentcited by 3
  13. 2018On the Worst-Case Complexity of TimSortcited by 2
  14. 2025Temporal Tokenization Strategies for Event Sequence Modeling with Large Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Exploring Network-Knowledge Graph Duality: A Case Study in Agentic Supply Chain Risk Analysis
  2. 2026Automating Supply Chain Disruption Monitoring via an Agentic AI Approach
  3. 2026LLM-Grounded Explainable AI for Supply Chain Risk Early Warning via Temporal Graph Attention Networks
  4. 2024Agentic LLMs in the Supply Chain: Towards Autonomous Multi-Agent Consensus-Seeking
  5. 2026Agentic AI Autonomy Assessment: A Decision-Support Framework Towards Governed Supply Chain Systems
  6. 2025Integrating Large Language Models with Network Optimization for Interactive and Explainable Supply Chain Planning: A Real-World Case Study
  7. 2025RADAR: A Risk-Aware Dynamic Multi-Agent Framework for LLM Safety Evaluation via Role-Specialized Collaboration
  8. 2026SupChain-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Real-World Supply Chain Management