mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LLM-Grounded Explainable AI for Supply Chain Risk Early Warning via Temporal Graph Attention Networks

arXiv 2603.04818 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Disruptions at critical logistics nodes pose severe risks to global supply chains, yet existing risk prediction systems typically prioritize forecasting accuracy without providing operationally interpretable early warnings. This paper proposes an evidence-grounded framework that jointly performs supply chain bottleneck prediction and faithful natural-language risk explanation by coupling a Temporal Graph Attention Network (TGAT) with a structured large language model (LLM) reasoning module. Using maritime hubs as a representative case study for global supply chain nodes, daily spatial graphs are constructed from Automatic Identification System (AIS) broadcasts, where inter-node interactions are modeled through attention-based message passing. The TGAT predictor captures spatiotemporal risk dynamics, while model-internal evidence -- including feature z-scores and attention-derived neighbor influence -- is transformed into structured prompts that constrain LLM reasoning to verifiable model outputs. To evaluate explanatory reliability, we introduce a directional-consistency validation protocol that quantitatively measures agreement between generated risk narratives and underlying statistical evidence. Experiments on six months of real-world logistics data demonstrate that the proposed framework outperforms baseline models, achieving a test AUC of 0.761, AP of 0.344, and recall of 0.504 under a strict chronological split while producing early warning explanations with 99.6% directional consistency. Results show that grounding LLM generation in graph-model evidence enables interpretable and auditable risk reporting without sacrificing predictive performance. The framework provides a practical pathway toward operationally deployable explainable AI for supply chain risk early warning and resilience management.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2026.

Builds on

4 of 15 references.

References · 4

  1. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  2. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  3. 2026Resilient Routing: Risk-Aware Dynamic Routing in Smart Logistics via Spatiotemporal Graph Learningcited by 12
  4. 2026Tiny-Critic RAG: Empowering Agentic Fallback with Parameter-Efficient Small Language Modelscited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Exploring Network-Knowledge Graph Duality: A Case Study in Agentic Supply Chain Risk Analysis
  2. 2026Automating Supply Chain Disruption Monitoring via an Agentic AI Approach
  3. 2026Reliable LLM-Powered Decision Engines for Large-Scale Supply Chain Operations: Architecture, Safety, and Performance Guarantees
  4. 2026LogiScope-VQA: Benchmarking Vision-Language Models for Logistics Hazard Identification in Industrial Scenarios
  5. 2026SupChain-Bench: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Real-World Supply Chain Management
  6. 2025Leveraging Knowledge Graphs and LLM Reasoning to Identify Operational Bottlenecks for Warehouse Planning Assistance
  7. 2026CSCBench: A PVC Diagnostic Benchmark for Commodity Supply Chain Reasoning
  8. 2024Agentic LLMs in the Supply Chain: Towards Autonomous Multi-Agent Consensus-Seeking