mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Transparency as Answerability: Role-Dependent Information Flow Modeling

arXiv 2610.16887 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Transparency in AI-supported decision systems is widely required but poorly defined. Existing approaches treat transparency as a property of systems or components, producing characteristic failures: assessments that do not transfer across organizational boundaries, stakeholder questions that cannot be formulated within the available frame of analysis, and component-level findings that say nothing about system-level behavior. We propose treating transparency as a relation: a system is transparent to a stakeholder to the degree that their legitimate questions are answerable from its structure. We formalize this using information flow networks, in which transparency questions are expressed in terms of network structure and answerability is the condition that the system settles them. The framework supports three dimensions of analysis: structural answerability from the network alone, compositional answerability across organizational boundaries for deployed systems, and role-dependent answerability given a stakeholder's accessible sub-network. We demonstrate the framework on a real pre-integration assessment of an AI recruitment tool in a public sector municipality. The assessment uses participatory design and interviews to model the decision system structure. We show how structural and role-dependent transparency questions can be formally stated and analyzed across the Provider and Deployer boundary where the AI system is composed together with the deployer's decision process.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

Builds on

10 of 32 references.

References · 10

  1. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  2. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,206
  3. 2020Closing the AI Accountability Gap: Defining an End-to-End Framework for Internal Algorithmic Auditingcited by 384
  4. 2017Explainable AI: Beware of Inmates Running the Asylum Or: How I Learnt to Stop Worrying and Love the Social and Behavioural Sciencescited by 85
  5. 2021Demystifying the Draft EU Artificial Intelligence Actcited by 84
  6. 2020The Pragmatic Turn in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)cited by 54
  7. 2023Understanding accountability in algorithmic supply chainscited by 40
  8. 2022Rethinking Fairness: An Interdisciplinary Survey of Critiques of Hegemonic ML Fairness Approachescited by 25
  9. 2024Axe the X in XAI: A Plea for Understandable AIcited by 2
  10. 2025Modeling Fairness in Recruitment AI via Information Flowcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.