Optimal Transport PAC-Bayes Bounds
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
PAC-Bayesian generalization bounds are among the strongest distribution-dependent guarantees in statistical learning and are typically expressed in terms of the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between a prior and posterior distribution. While analytically convenient, the KL divergence requires the posterior to be absolutely continuous w.r.t. the prior, imposing support constraints that can substantially restrict the choice of posterior. Moreover, the KL divergence does not account for the underlying geometry of the probability space. In this work, we derive new PAC-Bayesian bounds replacing the KL divergence with general optimal transport (OT) distances, including the total variation and Wasserstein-p distances.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.
Builds on
10 of 32 references.
References · 10
- 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 780
- 2017Computing Nonvacuous Generalization Bounds for Deep (Stochastic) Neural Networks with Many More Parameters than Training Datacited by 533
- 2018Stronger generalization bounds for deep nets via a compression approachcited by 307
- 2021User-friendly introduction to PAC-Bayes boundscited by 239
- 2018Non-Vacuous Generalization Bounds at the ImageNet Scale: A PAC-Bayesian Compression Approachcited by 126
- 2016Simpler PAC-Bayesian Bounds for Hostile Datacited by 46
- 2021Measuring Generalization with Optimal Transportcited by 25
- 2023Learning via Wasserstein-Based High Probability Generalisation Boundscited by 12
- 2018An Optimal Transport View on Generalizationcited by 5
- 2026Separating Geometry from Probability in the Analysis of Generalizationcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.