mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Sound to Sense: An Anatomy of Semantic Supervision for Speech-Driven Visual Grounding in Remote Sensing Imagery

arXiv 2610.16364 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2026cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Speech-driven visual grounding in remote sensing (RSVG) removes the typing bottleneck of text-based interaction and is intended to preserve prosodic intent, enabling hands-free target acquisition in time-critical missions. The direct-audio paradigm, mapping raw speech straight to a bounding box and bypassing automatic speech recognition (ASR), was recently adopted by RSTalker, but what such grounders actually learn about language remains unmeasured. SemEcho grafts a frozen Whisper speech pathway onto a VLTVG grounding host so that speech and text share one decoder, making the paired text, free by construction since speech corpora in this task are synthesized from DIOR-RSVG expressions, a training-time teacher and a fair, same-host text upper bound. On this instrument we dissect three semantic injection channels (feature-mimicry distillation, word-level CTC supervision, and two-stage ASR pretraining) with linear semantic probes, and release Audio-DIOR-R (80,973 training clips; 10 timbres x K=3; Qwen3-TTS synthesis with online sox noise lambda in [0, 0.4]) and Audio-DIOR-Comp, a re-split holding out 17 attribute-category combinations under a 2x2 acoustic-semantic protocol. Our anatomy yields four findings. (i) Whether direct alignment beats a domain-trained ASR cascade is decided by recognizer quality: against a weak in-domain cascade (CTC 0.53) direct wins by 9.0 [email protected] points with transcription errors concentrated on spatial-relation words, but a strong in-domain cascade (CTC 0.029) reaches the text upper bound (80.8 vs. 81.0) and beats even the strongest direct model by 8.8 points; the anti-ASR premise holds only against weak recognizers.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

Builds on

13 of 26 references.

References · 13

  1. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  2. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
  3. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  4. 2022Robust Speech Recognition via Large-Scale Weak Supervisioncited by 4,057
  5. 2020Gradient Surgery for Multi-Task Learningcited by 1,256
  6. 2017GradNorm: Gradient Normalization for Adaptive Loss Balancing in Deep Multitask Networkscited by 834
  7. 2021SUPERB: Speech processing Universal PERformance Benchmarkcited by 666
  8. 2023RemoteCLIP: A Vision Language Foundation Model for Remote Sensingcited by 363
  9. 2021TransVG: End-to-End Visual Grounding with Transformerscited by 271
  10. 2022RSVG: Exploring Data and Models for Visual Grounding on Remote Sensing Datacited by 123
  11. 2021Open World Compositional Zero-Shot Learningcited by 101
  12. 2020Deep Audio-Visual Learning: A Surveycited by 69
1 more
  1. 2022Shifting More Attention to Visual Backbone: Query-modulated Refinement Networks for End-to-End Visual Groundingcited by 53

Built on by

Not cited yet.