ReAP: From Visual Failure Recognition to Action-Conditioned Risk Prediction for Runtime Failure Monitoring
New in Vision-language-action models; no direction yet. Vision-language-action models
Abstract (arXiv)
Despite rapid progress, generalist robot policies remain brittle during execution. Reliable deployment therefore requires runtime monitoring that provides timely warnings of failure. Existing monitors commonly estimate risk from current observations or policy signals without explicitly predicting the future consequences of proposed actions. To anticipate such risks before action execution, we introduce ReAP, a future-aware runtime monitoring framework that combines visual failure recognition with action-conditioned failure prediction. Specifically, ReAP first trains a visual detector on successful and failed rollouts to learn a failure-relevant representation space and estimate current risk. An action-conditioned predictor then forecasts the resulting future representation in this space to estimate future failure risk. At runtime, the detector and predictor provide complementary signals for current-state failure recognition and future-aware risk assessment. Experiments across diverse robot policies in simulation and the real world demonstrate that ReAP effectively balances failure-detection accuracy and warning timeliness.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026FARM: Reading Failure Signals from the Internal Predictive States of a Frozen Robotic World Model
- 2026Foresight: Failure Detection for Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulation with Action-Conditioned World Model Latents
- 2026FAR: Failure-Aware Retry for Test-Time Recovery and Continual Policy Improvement
- 2025Failure Prediction at Runtime for Generative Robot Policies
- 2023Model-Based Runtime Monitoring with Interactive Imitation Learning
- 2025Can We Detect Failures Without Failure Data? Uncertainty-Aware Runtime Failure Detection for Imitation Learning Policies
- 2026FailureSpot: Label-Efficient Timestamp-Level Failure Detection for Vision-Language-Action Models
- 2024Unpacking Failure Modes of Generative Policies: Runtime Monitoring of Consistency and Progress