mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Constitution Speaks Nheengatu: An Open MT System and Reproducible Corpus Pipeline for the Amazonian L'ingua Geral

arXiv 2610.14760 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2026cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Nheengatu (yrl), the Amazonian L'ingua Geral, has 6--10 thousand speakers and is co-official in S~ao Gabriel da Cachoeira (Brazil), yet remains poorly served by evaluated Portuguese--Nheengatu MT resources. We present the largest parallel corpus assembled for the language (14.5k Portuguese--Nheengatu pairs), anchored by the 2023 official translation of the Brazilian Federal Constitution; the first MT evaluation set built from transcribed spontaneous speech; and, to our knowledge, the first open-weight MT models dedicated to bidirectional Portuguese--Nheengatu translation. Three findings organize the paper. First, translation into Nheengatu on held-out constitutional articles plateaus on development data regardless of training length or model size, and much of the remaining error sits in conventional legal terms that the written sources do not attest consistently; a terminology success rate over a frozen lexicon shows that glossary mechanisms at training time and lexical constraints at decoding each raise term realization, the latter at a cost in repetitive output that chrF++ barely registers. Second, a corpus expansion that adds transcribed conversation raises speech chrF++ by 24--27 points while leaving written domains unchanged, a register gap that written-only benchmarks cannot see. Third, a larger NLLB model helps translation into Portuguese but not into Nheengatu on legal or speech text. For Portuguese-to-Nheengatu translation, our final systems reach 31.7--32.8 chrF++ on article-disjoint constitutional text, 64.1--64.5 on the near-domain set (62.1 after removing items with target-side content overlap), and 45.2--47.5 on speech.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.

Builds on

13 of 34 references.

References · 13

  1. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  2. 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
  3. 2020The State and Fate of Linguistic Diversity and Inclusion in the NLP Worldcited by 798
  4. 2021The FLORES-101 Evaluation Benchmark for Low-Resource and Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 560
  5. 2018Fast Lexically Constrained Decoding with Dynamic Beam Allocation for Neural Machine Translationcited by 182
  6. 2023A Benchmark for Learning to Translate a New Language from One Grammar Bookcited by 75
  7. 2024Teaching Large Language Models an Unseen Language on the Flycited by 30
  8. 2023Ethical Considerations for Machine Translation of Indigenous Languages: Giving a Voice to the Speakerscited by 27
  9. 2021Facilitating Terminology Translation with Target Lemma Annotationscited by 20
  10. 2025Understanding In-Context Machine Translation for Low-Resource Languages: A Case Study on Manchucited by 13
  11. 2023Bilex Rx: Lexical Data Augmentation for Massively Multilingual Machine Translationcited by 8
  12. 2026Omnilingual MT: Machine Translation for 1,600 Languagescited by 5
1 more
  1. 2025Exploring Performance Variations in Finetuned Translators of Ultra-Low Resource Languages: Do Linguistic Differences Matter?cited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.