mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond a Better Score: Long-Horizon Agentic ML Development and Evaluation Protocol for Physics Time Series

arXiv 2610.14024 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.LG hep-excited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Financial trading and forecasting agents also fits: Web, search, and research agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Physics time-series data are central to fundamental discoveries involving dark matter, neutrinos, and gravitational waves. Machine learning has shown strong potential to recover weak scientific signals buried in complex noise. Recent LLM-agent systems further automate ML development, but existing approaches are often driven primarily by one or a few numerical scores. In pursuit of a better score, agents may exploit shortcuts, trigger mode collapse, or game the evaluation procedure, producing models that achieve high scores but are scientifically invalid. We introduce SIDERIUS, an LLM agent system designed to move beyond a better score toward scientifically valid, long-horizon ML development. SIDERIUS combines contract-defined composable capabilities for flexible orchestration and human-in-the-loop, a multi-layer scientific evaluation protocol that distinguishes valid models from unhealthy or gaming models, and resource-aware exploration for computationally expensive scientific ML. In our TIDMAD benchmark, SIDERIUS with a GPT-based orchestrator achieves the highest Valid-model proposal rate of 63.8% and the best valid denoising score of 2.744, compared with 1.6% and -0.647, respectively, for the same GPT model using the general-purpose Codex coding agent. We further benchmark SIDERIUS on three additional physics time-series datasets, demonstrating its reuse and performance across different tasks. Together, these results suggest that progress in agentic scientific ML should be measured beyond a better score, by how an agent explores and by whether the models it produces can be trusted as science.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Financial trading and forecasting agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 15 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

15 of 21 references.

References · 15

  1. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,988
  2. 2023MetaGPT: Meta Programming for A Multi-Agent Collaborative Frameworkcited by 1,808
  3. 2024MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineeringcited by 469
  4. 2024AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generationcited by 432
  5. 2024Automated Design of Agentic Systemscited by 407
  6. 2023MLAgentBench: Evaluating Language Agents on Machine Learning Experimentationcited by 366
  7. 2024Agent-as-a-Judge: Evaluate Agents with Agentscited by 238
  8. 2024AI Agents That Mattercited by 219
  9. 2024RE-Bench: Evaluating frontier AI R&D capabilities of language model agents against human expertscited by 175
  10. 2026Towards End-to-End Automation of AI Researchcited by 159
  11. 2025AI Research Agents for Machine Learning: Search, Exploration, and Generalization in MLE-benchcited by 71
  12. 2025AgenticSciML: Collaborative Multi-Agent Systems for Emergent Discovery in Scientific Machine Learningcited by 14
3 more
  1. 2025Jr. AI Scientist and Its Risk Report: Autonomous Scientific Exploration from a Baseline Papercited by 12
  2. 2025Agents of Discoverycited by 3
  3. 2024TIDMAD: Time Series Dataset for Discovering Dark Matter with AI Denoisingcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026gwBenchmarks: Stress-Testing LLM Agents on High-Precision Gravitational Wave Astronomy
  2. 2025SciML Agents: Write the Solver, Not the Solution
  3. 2025TimeSeriesGym: A Scalable Benchmark for (Time Series) Machine Learning Engineering Agents
  4. 2025PhysGym: Benchmarking LLMs in Interactive Physics Discovery with Controlled Priors
  5. 2026DiscoverPhysics: Benchmarking LLMs for Out-of-the-Box Scientific Thinking
  6. 2025PhysMaster: Building an Autonomous AI Physicist for Theoretical and Computational Physics Research
  7. 2025Towards Scientific Intelligence: A Survey of LLM-based Scientific Agents
  8. 2026Competing with AI Scientists: Agent-Driven Approach to Astrophysics Research